Sunday, March 1, 2009

Bend Bulletin Stops Publishing, Cessna Closes

With the release of January's unemployment figures, I think it's pretty safe to say we've reached the End of Days here in Bend.

It hasn't happened but a lot of things we're all accustomed to are going to go away. And Buster is pretty infamous for saying we're reverting to Olde Bend. But I think it's going to be worse than that.

Bubbles have a funny way of bursting. And the bursting doesn't seem to go according to anyone's plan.

I don't think we're going to have a local paper much longer. The economics aren't there.

So much of this place, the Bulletin included, survived, and thrived, due to RE. They were conjoined twins in an ever-escalating swell of leverage-fueled prosperity.

Now though, we're in The Great Unwind. The Big Deleveraging. The Big One.

We're in the most vicious down-spiral ever witnessed in our lifetimes, and still most people in Bend don't get it. There's still this enduring idea that We Are Near The Bottom, and things are going to turn around momentarily, thank you very much Dana Bratton.

But, of course, this is not true.

The RE/Bend media conjoined twin is on life support.
CACB, 3yrs

We only really have CACB to go from as a barometer of local financial health (OK, we have Prineville Bancorp PNVL, but it ain't exactly busting out either). And the patient is near death.

CACB officially went to penny stock status this week. 90 cents. Look at that chart, it's almost zero. Down 97% from it's peak.

Now the question isn't If it'll be shutdown, but When.

And if The Bully was a pubicly traded company, you would see something similar. A company on the verge of collapse.

Same with construction.

Same with local manufacturing. Manufacturing actually lost more jobs this past month in OR than construction.

The seemingly invulnerable combination of Bend media & the local RE juggernaut aren't just going to get slimmed down, they are dying. They will be dead in a year or so.

The whole infrastructure of this place -- the constant influx of people, the building, the new businesses... the whole freshness & zest & zeal, for lack of better terms -- is stopping.

We had 1 in 9 people unemployed in December. It's about to go to 1 in 8 for Jan. And in the month just gone, it promises to get even worse. And there's no end in sight.

Even the perma-optimist Obama, said that 2009 is going to get much worse before it gets better.

And I think it just hit me -- I think it was Tuesday -- that Bend is turning into Burns.

People do not go to Burns.

But Wait, you say. Homes will become cheap enough that people will want to stay here. Look at sales, they do seem to be bottoming out, as local RE-types have said. Right?

Homes are cheap in Burns.

The problem in Burns is Not cheap housing. It's no jobs. What jobs that are there, are low-wage, go-nowhere jobs. You cannot Build A Life in Burns.

There's something far more important than rock-bottom low prices to living somewhere: It's Building A Life.

It's doing something this year that makes you more than you were last year. It's making yourself a better person. It's seeing that you are piling up a skill set that is actually valuable out in The World. It's about some sort of legacy, a Life That Matters.

You can't build a life that matters in Burns.

And like a desert sandstorm can reclaim and consume an entire region, the desert is about to reclaim Bend.

Bend had been pushing out -- extending its prosperity oasis towards Burns, towards La Pine & Christmas Valley, towards Madras. The shoots of growth that started 30 years ago actually seemed like they had conquered the unconquerable. They had multiplied a thousand fold.

No more. The desert is pushing back and is going to reclaim this place.

I think a lot of people think (I was one of them): "Great! After prices fall far enough, I'm going to snatch up my own sweet-ass, rock-bottom foreclosure and just lord it over all my stupid friends who bought at bubble tops. Awesome!"

No. You might want to think about that. You might want to make a visit to Burns first.

Because I think I have a fairly prescient idea of what's going to happen here, in broad strokes.

The City will go broke.

Local paper will go broke.

Local banks will go broke.

Local restaurants will go broke.

Unemployment will reach Depression era levels.

This place will become a ghost town of The Walking Dead.

Like Burns. No life, no future, no human legacy, no nothing.

That just sort of hit me this past week. I'm starting to see quite a bit of empty parking, where it was once so full so constantly, it was really annoying sometimes.

They say downtown is filling up almost as fast as it is emptying out -- whatever that means -- but it is a losing battle. Downtown is emptying out nonetheless. Same thing all over town.

You can see The Walking Dead all around. It's 1 in 7 people here.

But at least Burns is functional; Burns has a grip on reality. Burns isn't pretending to be something it's not.

Burns has crappy shit-jobs, and crappy shit-houses. Both are at the ass-bottom of the money scale, whether paying or pricing.

Look at Bubble Bend: The whole West side is populated with vacant 3,500 sf McMansions. They were $850K. Now they're $550K. And of course, no one is buying.

No one gets it here. We have an Aspenesque housing market, that has just been plopped into a Burnsesque economy. Bend is so self-conflicted, so paradoxical, inconsistent and incongruous, it's mere existence is almost impossible.

What happens to a place that is Wall-To-Wall with mansions, where The Money seems to have taken on a will of it's own and fled, leaving confused and penniless humans behind?

Yes. It hit me this week.

Bank of the Cascades is going to be extinguished. And the dominoes will start falling in rapid succession after that.

The Bulletin will close. Cessna will close. Even the mighty St Charles may fall. The Old Mill will implode. Most of the restaurants, boutiques, art galleries, festivals, fairs, parades, schools, police stations, and local governments will simply fold.

That doesnt just mean "Cheap". That means Burns. That means No Life. That means Get Out As Soon As Possible.

See, people don't care about cheap, when their lifes work is in peril. Again, drive to Burns to witness the phenomenon for yourself.

I can buy a house today Cash in Burns. No going to though. My life is more important than getting a cheap house. If that's all I cared about, I'd be in Detroit right now.

A lot of people around here have been drinking the RE Kool Aid for so long that they can't imagine a life that doesn't revolve around RE, it's their lifeblood. It's pricing, the sales volume, the transacting, the ebb & flow of it, it's every movement, no matter how inconsequntial, is of riveting importance. Been like that for 30 years.

But in the end, this mindset will prove to be a phantom, fleeting.

Bend went from Safety to Self-actualization so forcefully & quickly, that it seemed like it was preordained. We are God's people, this is our fate to live life at it's pinnacle.

But actually this place is about existing at the Physiological level. It's at The Burns Level. It's in the red.

This is why I say Burns is Honest. Burns knows it sucks. Bend also sucks, but we think that we'll be OK, because we have surrounded ourselves with the edifices of Self Actualization, of that Shining Golden City on The Hill.

What happens in a place surrounded by the edifices of opulence after a monetary neutron bomb has gone off? What happens when you realize a place cannot ever sustain a Life Worth Living? What happens when you realize that Bend has essentially turned into Burns?

You leave. The desert reclaims it's own.

454 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   401 – 454 of 454   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

OREO solution is MORE 'insurance companys', NOT the solution, this would mean MORE problems.

Why HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES ARE THE PROBLEM! (updated) And a question.
March 7, 2009, 5:20AM

Here is Health Insurance Company CEO Salaries from 2005 (can't seem to find 2008 figures yet) and the total from the previous 5 Years. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE to have true Universal Health CARE when CEOs like these are involved in this. Updated part below.



* United Health Group
CEO: William W McGuire
2005: 124.8 mil
5-year: 342 mil
* Aetna
CEO: John Rowe
2005: 22.1 mil
5-year:57.8 mil
* Cigna
CEO: H. Edward Hanway
2005:13.3 mil
5-year:62.8 mil
* McKesson
CEO: John Hammergen
2005: 13.4 mil
5-year:31.2 mil
* WellPoint
CEO: Larry Glasscock
2005: 23 mil
5-year: 46.8 mil




The Update

ANNUAL COMPENSATION OF HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY EXECUTIVES (2006 and 2007 figures): These figures don't appear to INCLUDE STOCK OPTIONS.

• Ronald A. Williams, Chair/ CEO, Aetna Inc., $23,045,834
• H. Edward Hanway, Chair/ CEO, Cigna Corp, $30.16 million
• David B. Snow, Jr, Chair/ CEO, Medco Health, $21.76 million
• Michael B. MCallister, CEO, Humana Inc, $20.06 million
• Stephen J. Hemsley, CEO, UnitedHealth Group, $13,164,529
• Angela F. Braly, President/ CEO, Wellpoint, $9,094,771
• Dale B. Wolf, CEO, Coventry Health Care, $20.86 million
• Jay M. Gellert, President/ CEO, Health Net, $16.65 million
• William C. Van Faasen, Chairman, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, $3 million plus $16.4 million in retirement benefits
• Charlie Baker, President/ CEO, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, $1.5 million
• James Roosevelt, Jr., CEO, Tufts Associated Health Plans, $1.3 million
• Cleve L. Killingsworth, President/CEO Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, $3.6 million
• Raymond McCaskey, CEO, Health Care Service Corp (Blue Cross Blue Shield), $10.3 million
• Daniel P. McCartney, CEO, Healthcare Services Group, Inc, $ 1,061,513
• Daniel Loepp, CEO, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, $1,657,555
• Todd S. Farha, CEO, WellCare Health Plans, $5,270,825
• Michael F. Neidorff, CEO, Centene Corp, $8,750,751
• Daniel Loepp, CEO, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, $1,657,555
• Todd S. Farha, CEO, WellCare Health Plans, $5,270,825
• Michael F. Neidorff, CEO, Centene Corp, $8,750,751



If you can find more recent figures please post them.



The more information the better.

One more question... Does anyone else think that maybe, just maybe, auto Insurance should be paid for with a gas tax? Think about it, the more you drive the more you pay. Then insurance companies would actually have to compete for your business based on the service they provide. And wouldn't this really be a kind of "Flat Tax"?

I am trying to get info on auto insurance CEOs, will post them as soon as I get good numbers in future updates.

Anonymous said...

The problem with todays insurance debate is that it is RAN by Rambo Emmanuels DR brother, is 100% against 'single payer', thus the entire OREO health debate is a charade.

Bewert said...

Marijuana Investigation Ends in Fatal Shooting and Arrest of 80-Year-Old

March 6, 2009 - 9:17 AM
The ASSOCIATED PRESS

MULINO, Ore. (AP) - A marijuana arrest in the Clackamas County town Mulino has apparently ended in a shooting death.

Two sheriff's deputies reported shots fired and a person down at a home where they were trying to serve arrest warrants late Wednesday involving a marijuana growing investigation from last year.

Deputies did not give any details about the person who was killed, saying they had to notify the family.

But they arrested 80-year-old Marjorie Crawford on outstanding warrants for manufacturing, delivery and possession of marijuana. The deputies were not injured and have been placed on administrative leave under sheriff's department policy for officer-involved shootings. Their names will be released later.

Anonymous said...

Mixing it UP, a voice of HOPE. My problem with this is you don't 'HOPE for CHANGE', and put GEITHNER in charge of US Treasury. You don't HOPE for change and put DR-Rahmbo-Emmanuel in charge of Health-Care. This is why DR-GUPTA, who is actually a good man, removed his name from sturgeon-general.


Time to overhaul U.S. health system

By LISA VAN DUSEN

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Thursday's White House Forum on Health Reform was a long way from the trench warfare of the last attempt at overhauling this country's health care system in 1993.

The politicians, officials, insurance executives, pharma reps and others in the summit's five working groups laid out their positions as though they would have been just as civilized if they weren't being webcast, though the cameras probably helped.

But even this effort, which has a much better shot at success for being 16 years deeper into disaster, sometimes seemed like a polite but surreal rearranging of the deck chairs on the Titanic that never really sinks, just keeps taking on money every time one hole gets patched and another bursts open.

As Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, citing the famous Harry and Louise scare ad that helped kill the Bill Clinton overhaul in 1993, said, "We are past the Harry and Louise moment. We're at the Thelma and Louise moment: We're in the car and heading for the cliff."

For a foreigner from a country with what Harry and Louise would have thought of as a Soviet-style system of enforced health care delivered by doctors chosen from a government-supplied list called "Quacks You're Afraid of," just listening to the positions of the stakeholders on this issue, no matter how conciliatory, was a reminder of how crazy the U.S. system is.

If it were complicated and working, it might not be soaring into the Grand Canyon. As it is, the most notoriously inequitable system among G-7 countries is such an impenetrable tangle of coverage options and sub-systems and prohibitions and large and small-scale nightmares that it sometimes seems as if the industry made itself that way to ward off reform-minded political predators.

In normal times, this issue alone would be more than enough of a challenge for a new administration to take on, with the tangle of vested interests to reconcile -- the billion-dollar-a-year health care lobby, the AARP, the unions, the pharmaceutical companies, the business lobbies, the American Medical Association and on and on -- and the traditional partisan divide on the issue to overcome. The best argument for not doing it -- that the economy is in the tank -- is the best one for doing it because of the enormous cost of a system that can't possibly get any cheaper in its existing form.

"There has been some talk that we're taking on too much," President Barack Obama said at the closing session Thursday. "When times were good, we didn't get it done, when we had mild recessions, we didn't get it done, when we were in peacetime, when we were at war. There's always a reason not to do it. It strikes me that now is exactly the time to deal with this problem."

The fact that Sen. Ted Kennedy, who has spent so much of his own political life and capital fighting for health-care reform, was able to be there Thursday despite his ongoing battle with brain cancer, seemed to underscore that.

When Obama was a candidate, talk of televised health-care consultations seemed wildly optimistic if not reckless. But this issue is now urgent because the cost issues that individuals, small businesses and whole industries have been protesting are now suddenly unsustainable.

Meanwhile, there was still talk about how the solution can't be made in Canada or made in Europe or made in Japan but has to be made in America. In an era when there is no shortage of immediate information on what mistakes were made elsewhere and which national systems work or don't, that seems dangerously closed-minded.

So, selling reform as necessary because the U.S. system is more costly and inefficient than France's or Britain's or Canada's may not necessarily work too well yet. But Americans are compassionate people, especially in hard times, and if part of the consultation process on reform is letting real people tell their stories of the human cost of a system so broken it actually destroys lives, that may be worth more than all the global competitiveness figures in the world.

Anonymous said...

But they arrested 80-year-old Marjorie Crawford on outstanding warrants for manufacturing, delivery and possession of marijuana.

*

Sort of reminds me of the great-depression, and 'prohibition' , people are starving, so they make moonshine to get $$$, and then they play cat&mouse with the pig's.

The more people are forced into poverty, the more they'll grow pot and distill shine, and the more cops will kick their doors down, good biz for all.

It's really a proud day in ORYGUN that the MULINO pigs got an 80yr criminal granny in their prison.

Bewert said...

Deputies shoot and kill man in Mulino during arrest; 80-year-old to be arraigned on drug charges
by Noelle Crombie, The Oregonian

MULINO -- Clackamas County sheriff's deputies shot and killed a person while serving an arrest warrant on a rural property in the Mulino-area late Wednesday night.

Authorities are not releasing the name of the individual who was fatally shot, who has been taken to the medical examiner's office, which will perform an autopsy today.

Clackamas County sheriff's detective Jeff Green said an 80-year-old woman, Marjorie Crawford, was taken from the scene in an ambulance after the shooting.

She was treated for injuries that Green said were not related to the shooting.

She was booked today on accusations of manufacturing, possessing and distributing marijuana and is due to be arraigned at 3 p.m. in Clackamas County court.

The charges stem from a longstanding investigation by various law enforcement agencies that serve on a regional drug task force, Green said.

Green said deputies have been to the home, located at 13262 S. Macksburg Road, at least once in the fall of 2008. The nature of that visit had to do with drugs, Green said.

Crawford and the shooting victim were at the home when a pair of deputies arrived about 10:30 p.m. to serve the arrest warrant.

Nine minutes later the deputies broadcast on their radios that shots had been fired and a person was "down."

The sheriff's tactical team and detectives responded, taking Crawford into custody.

Green refused to say more about the incident, including whether Crawford or the shooting victim were armed.

However, Michael Crawford, Marjorie's son, said his mother's boyfriend was the one who was fatally shot.

He said his sister spoke with his mother early this morning. His mother said police arrived at the home and banged on the door.

He said Crawford's boyfriend, Hubert Henkel, 68, got a shotgun, went to the door and was shot by police.

Deputies would not confirm the account.

Crawford, who lives in Beaverton, said his mother and Henkel had been growing marijuana and were selling it to locals. He said the property was raided last fall.

The deputies have been placed on paid leave, as is the standard practice in officer-involved shootings.

Green would not identify the officers or say how long either had been with the agency.

This morning the home where the shooting took place was surrounded by yellow crime tape. A news helicopter and news crews staked out the isolated stretch of road.

###

The "war" on pot is ridiculous.

Anonymous said...

As Californians Leave BEND they take their GARBAGE with them, ...

Any side-bets that BEND starts importing ARLINGTON-OR garbage?? Which is where Seattle sends its garbage to ORYGUN. With all this capacity, BEND could also be a garbage mecca!!!!!!!!

A Weak Economy Means Less Garbage for Central Oregon

3/6/09 Bend

By Doug Johnson

In an effort to save money, Tyler Nicoll and his roommate take their trash to the Knott Landfill on 27th Street in Bend, themselves.

"Take a trailer full, costs about ten bucks, takes about two months and pretty much it's better than the trash collection," Nicoll says.

A garbage pick up service would cost Nicoll about twenty six dollars a month. And lately the garbage loads have been getting smaller.

"We just buy less now, because the economy is down," Nicoll says.

And he's not alone. The Deschutes County Department of Solid Waste says the amount of garbage is down ten percent this year compared to last, about thirty thousand tons fewer. And that's down 29 percent from the year before that.

"This is the first time that I've been here in 23 years, that we've seen less tons from one year to the next, despite whatever economic situations going on out there," says Timm Schimke, Director of the Deschutes County Department of Solid Waste.

One reason is less construction going on. But now household wastes are down, as individuals are buying less. This is both good and bad news for the Department of Solid Waste. On the one hand the county landfill is going to fill up a lot slower, which is better for the environment. But on the other hand, the department is going to see a drop in revenue.

"Less tons less dollars," Schimke says.

And that means less money to build the next landfill cell. The current site will be full in less than a year.

"Because even though we might be 20 percent less in waste, it doesn't mean I can wait another year, I still have to construct that cell on schedule," Schimke says.

It costs four-million dollars for that cell which is scheduled to open in spring of 2010. And Deschutes County is not alone either. In Crook County commercial waste is down fifty percent compared to last year, and household waste is down thirty three percent. That landfill has already had to lay off three employees. Waste at the Jefferson County Landfill is also down ten percent from last year. As a result, fees there will be raised one dollar per ton for the next seven years.

Anonymous said...

OPB just seems to tell a balanced story, without the BULL.

Lumber Industry Slide Continues In Central Oregon

BY ETHAN LINDSEY

Two more lumberyards in central Oregon will close over the next several weeks.

Parr Lumber says it can’t keep its Madras and Redmond stores open during the recession.

The Hillsboro-based company competes with Home Depot and other national chains.

Jennifer Swick is marketing director for Parr Lumber.

She says sales have slowed to contractors and home builders – but ‘do-it-yourself’ retail sales have actually picked up.

Jennifer Swick: “Our stores are relying heavily on retail traffic to get us through this. And unfortunately the Redmond and Madras locations, we just haven’t been able to get that retail traffic. I don’t know if it’s a competitive situation – I know there’s big box competition.”

The troubles in the home construction business mean sawmills are shutting regularly.

Interfor Pacific’s Gilchrist sawmill, south of Bend, says it is on the verge of going out of business.

Wood products manufacturing has lost close to 1000 jobs in Deschutes County since the peak of the housing boom in 2006.

Bewert said...

Family astonished by mother's arrest & Mulino shooting

09:01 AM PST on Friday, March 6, 2009

By kgw.com Staff

MULINO, Ore. -- Family members told KGW they were shocked to learn that a Mulino man was shot and killed at his home late Wednesday night and his 80-year-old girlfriend was arrested for making and selling pot.

Deputies went to the home at 13262 S. Macksburg Rd. to arrest two people on warrants late Wednesday night, according to Detective Jeffrey Green. Then, a man opened the door with a firearm, according to investigators, and "a confrontation ensued." The man was shot and killed, deputies said.

Although police have not officially identified him, neighbors told KGW the man who died was 68-year-old Bert Henkle and he had lived on the rural property more than 25 years. Henkle's girlfriend, Marjorie Crawford, 80, was arrested at the scene and taken to an area hospital for treatment of an unrelated medical issue before she was taken to jail on marijuana charges.

Neighbors were stunned when they learned what happened. “He was the hardest working guy I've ever met. He worked from as soon as there was light in the morning, until after dark every night,” said longtime neighbor Doug Harbord.

But according to court records obtained by KGW, authorities confiscated dozens of marijuana plants last October from the property Henkle shared with Crawford and there was an ongoing investigation.

“I find it hard to believe they were cultivating and selling and whatever else she's being charged with,” said Crawford’s daughter, Patti Bush. “She's really family oriented and helpful to others, there's nothing she wouldn't do.”

Visibly tired and clutching a cane as she walked, Crawford was released from the Clackamas County Jail Thursday night with her daughters at her side.

“We’re just wanting to know why it happened and how it happened,” Bush said.

Patti first heard about the shooting when she was awakened by a frantic phone call from her mother just after 11 p.m., Wednesday.

“She said ‘Bert's been shot and he's dead’ and I'm like, ‘what are you talking about?’”

Now the family has many more questions than answers.

Doug Harbord, who lives nearby, said he can't imagine how his friend could be considered threatening.

"If someone is banging on your door, making a bunch of noise that you're not expecting, out where we're at, I would go to the door with a shotgun in my hands ... even if they yelled 'police,'" Harbord said. "I don't know all the circumstances, but from what I know of Bert, I don't think he was a dangerous individual."

Neither deputy was hit by gunfire. Detective Green said they were later put on administrative leave, which is routine following a police-involved shooting.

Police said they had been investigating drug activity at the home since last fall, involving what they believe was an illegal marijuana-growing operation.

They said Crawford now faces charges for the manufacturing, delivery and possession of marijuana.

"The warrants came out of an investigation by the interagency task force with Clackamas County from this last fall," Green added.

Clackamas County has withheld the names of the two deputies involved in the shooting, pending internal review.

Anonymous said...

mother and Henkel had been growing marijuana and were selling it to locals. He said the property was raided last fall.

*

Whoooooaa can't keep your money in the HOOD, got to BUY mexican pot, and afghan opium, and columbian cocaine, ... got to keep the CIA & border-patrol in biz, ... got to shut down these locals, imagine if everyone grew their own pot and poppy, millions of law enforcement would have nothing to do, ...

The cops love to 'raid' these 'acreages' as they can seize the land, and apply it to their cop-budget.

Why chase bikers who cook meth, or mexican cartels that run dope on the I97 fwy, when you can bust granny???

Anonymous said...

"If someone is banging on your door, making a bunch of noise that you're not expecting, out where we're at, I would go to the door with a shotgun in my hands ... even if they yelled 'police,'" Harbord said. "I don't know all the circumstances, but from what I know of Bert, I don't think he was a dangerous individual."

*

Especially for growers this is a common fear, remember these cops are in black like NINJA's, and they yell order's and if you don't follow the orders they 'shoot to kill'.

Trouble is old guys, seem to think the home is the castle. They seem to think they can say, "I don't give a fuck who the hell you are, quit shining that flashlight in my face"...

It's an old story, if a cop say's JUMP, you jump, and if you don't your dead.

Anonymous said...

Well you got to admit, this is going to be an 'entertaining' debate, and I can say one thing in defense of LIMBAUGH, he takes the debate public, you can't get any more DEMOCRATIC than that, while STEELE&OREO&RAHMBO want to run shit from smoke filled rooms.

So Steele wants to 'broaden the base', aka move to the left, and limbaugh wants to 'stay put'. In the meantime OREO is moving to the right at light-speed, like I have said all along here, OREO is MORE bush than bush.


Fight Brewing Within GOP Over Soul, Future of Party


This week's dustup between GOP chief Michael Steele and influential radio host Rush Limbaugh underscored the struggle for the heart and soul of the Republican Party.

FOXNews.com

Friday, March 06, 2009

While congressional Republicans spar with Democrats in the White House and on Capitol Hill over spending and economic relief plans, another struggle is under way within the Republican Party over how it can reclaim its former dominance without sacrificing its principles.

This week's dustup between Michael Steele, the new national GOP chairman, and influential conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh underscored the competing dynamics at play as Steele pushes to expand the party beyond its traditional base and Limbaugh warns that base not to stray from conservative ideals.

As a result, many prominent people in the party are laying low, waiting to see whether a unifying voice will emerge to lead the GOP forward.

Some say the spat over Limbaugh's speech last weekend at a conservative conference didn't help. Steele called Limbaugh a mere "entertainer" who is sometimes "incendiary" and "ugly," comments for which Steele later apologized.

"Steele has been M.I.A. on his first month on the job and then he pulled a hand grenade on himself," a GOP strategist, who asked not to be identified for fear of antagonizing party leaders, told FOXNews.com. "Republicans are scratching their heads and wondering is this the person who's supposed to be leading the rebuilding of our party?

"When you completely implode in your first month and you haven't hired anyone, you start to look incompetent," the strategist added.

One member of the Republican National Committee even has called for Steele to resign. Dr. Ada Fisher, North Carolina's national committeewoman, reportedly e-mailed fellow RNC members that Steele is "eroding confidence" in the GOP and that members of his transition team should encourage him to step aside.

"I don't want to hear anymore language trying to be cool about the bling in the stimulus package or appealing to D.L. Hughley and blacks in a way that isn't going to win us any votes and make us frankly appear to many blacks as quite foolish," wrote Fisher, who is one of three black national GOP committee members.

Curt Anderson, a spokesman for Steele, said the controversy surrounding the chairman has been mostly hype, and he claimed that Fisher has an ax to grind against Steele.

"This chairman has said he's made inartful comments and made some mistakes. He said that," Anderson said. "The other thing, he promised in terms of the transition process, there would be major changes. Change is hard and a lot of people don't like it."

Anderson said part of the change was firing most of the staff. He said the RNC has received 1,400 resumes for positions.

"In some ways, this election was a changing of the guard and some of the old guard is not happy," he said.

Brent Woodcox, a spokesman for the North Carolina Republican Party, said the state GOP chairwoman did not agree with Fisher.

"It's far too early to judge Michael Steele on his tenure so far," Woodcox said, before he offered his own assessment.

"I think that he's brought a fresh perspective to the party, one that is looking to broaden the base, not by compromising its values but by going into the communities. I think the chairman is on the right course and if we can stop being distracted by things that don't matter, then we can be in a place where the Republican party can be strong again."

Democrats have reacted with glee to talk of the GOP imploding.

"It seems no one gets honeymoons anymore," said Democratic strategist Mary Anne Marsh, a former adviser to Sen. John Kerry.

Marsh said Steele made a mistake by showing how he would expand the base without first shoring up the base. But, she said, Steele can learn from former Democratic National Chairman Howard Dean, who also made some missteps at the beginning of his tenure before pulling back from the media glare and focusing on rebuilding the party infrastructure.

Anderson said the challenge for the RNC under Steele is making the party more relevant and producing solutions that work.

"I can't emphasize enough we like where the transition is right now," he said. "We understand when you win a close election, you have people within the Beltway waiting for you to make a mistake and kick you. We'll get through that. We think outside the Beltway there's a greater sense of optimism."

Anonymous said...

The limbaugh story is laughable, you have PUG insiders 'laying low', you have then accusing STEELE of being on 'vacation'.

You have LIMBAUGHS ratings sky rocketing, with ten's of millions of daily listeners ever ready for marching orders.

IMHO you can say the same about OREO as they're saying about STEELE. Hurls grenades, and then hides.

A good debate is essential.

Yet, the only 'truth' I have seen from any DEMorPUG bird, is that above by Robert Rheich, its the first truth that I have seen from TEAM-SINGLE-PARTY, status quo rulers of ameriKKKa.

Anonymous said...

FUCKIN Eh KUNTS, a DEM TELL's the Truth, too fucking Bad that Robert Rheich can't be given one of those 1200 un-fillable OREO jobs. OREO: All that is good is his fault, all that is bad is not his fault, .e.g. Hope&Change, hope for good shit, and change the subject when shit is bad.


Is Obama responsible for Wall Street's meltdown?


It's an absurd argument, but that's where populist rage on the right is heading.

By Robert Reich


March 5, 2009 |

Is Obama responsible for the meltdown of the Dow? The consistently wrongheaded Wall Street Journal's editorial page says so, as does Republican Fox News, CNN's reliably demagogic Lou Dobbs, and now CNBC (where, full disclosure, I frequently appear as a token liberal). CNBC's Jim Cramer, who bloviates nightly about stock picks, says Obama is pushing a "radical agenda" that's destroying investors' wealth. My friend Larry Kudlow, who rants nightly about nearly everything, says Obama is destroying capitalism. CNBC reporter Rick Santelli's ballistic nonsense about Obama's mortgage plan made him a pop-populist icon for a week or so.

The argument that Obama is somehow responsible for the collapse of Wall Street is absurd. First, every major policy that led to this collapse occurred under George W.'s watch (or, more accurately, his failure to watch). The housing and financial bubbles were created under Bush and exploded under Bush. The stock market began to collapse under Bush.

Second, it's inevitable that stocks, led by the bloated financial sector, would lose their remaining hot air as the new administration begins "stress-testing" the big banks, many of which are technically insolvent. After all, their share prices were built on a tissue of lies and dreams. Other sectors whose values were similarly distorted and distended by years of financial deception and regulatory disregard, such as housing and insurance, will also have to return to the real world before they can recover. Which could mean more stock losses.

Finally, none of the financial wizards who are now charging Obama with leading America into the abyss have offered an alternative plan for getting us out of the mess that, not incidentally, many of these same wizards happily led us into. For years, the Wall Street Journal editorial page and the financial gurus of cable news cheered as Wall Street leveraged its way into oblivion.

This bizarre charge wouldn't be worth mentioning were it not a market test for a more intense attack from Wall Street and Republican media outlets next year as the nation moves into the gravitational range of the 2010 midterm elections. Republicans have made no secret of their wish to blame Obama for the bad economy, and to stir up as much populist rage against his so-called socialist tendencies as politically possible. History shows how effective demagogic ravings can be when a public is stressed economically. Make no mistake: Angry right-wing populism lurks just below the surface of the terrible American economy, ready to be launched not only at Obama but also at liberals, intellectuals, gays, blacks, Jews, the mainstream media, coastal elites, crypto socialists, and any other potential target of paranoid opportunity.

To complicate matters for Republicans, however, grass-roots populist rage is also building against Wall Street itself, and with some justification. Top Wall Streeters who raked in tens of millions of dollars a year for more than a decade have now effectively eviscerated the pension fund savings of millions of middle-class American workers and destroyed millions of Main Street jobs. The public is understandably appalled that its tax dollars are being used to pay and prop up the very people and institutions responsible for this debacle. And there seems to be no end in sight: Citigroup and the insurance mammoth AIG, in particular, have become giant ongoing sump-pumps for tens of billions of public dollars. Yet no one seems to know exactly where these dollars are going, or why.

Worse: When it turns out that people like Lloyd Blankfein, the CEO of Goldman Sachs, who took home $68 million in 1997, was the only Wall Streeter in a meeting last September at the New York Federal Reserve to discuss the initial AIG bailout with Tim Geithner, then New York Fed chair, among others, at the very time Goldman was AIG's largest trading partner, a distinct scent of self-dealing begins to emanate. When it turns out that Citigroup got a bailout deal last October far more generous than that given to any other distressed bank, when a top Citi executive was advising the Treasury and Fed, the scent increases. Goldman's past CEO was treasury secretary at that time, by the way, and another former Goldman CEO was a top Citi official and also a former treasury secretary. I am not suggesting anything so crude as corruption. But could it be, given these tangled webs, that -- innocently, unintentionally, perhaps even subconsciously -- the entire bailout effort was premised on saving these companies rather than protecting the public? Or that the distinction between the two was lost, and still is?

The Wall Street and Republican media attack machine doesn't know exactly what to make of this. The Wall Street Journal's editorial page, along with CNBC, alternates between attacking Obama for bailing out Wall Street and excusing Wall Street's excesses. But then again, Obama doesn't seem to know exactly what to make of it either. He seems to vacillate as well -- one moment scorning Wall Street, the next moment justifying further bailouts. I do hope he takes a firmer hand, drawing a clearer distinction and making a clearer connection between clearing up these financial balance sheets and helping average people. Otherwise, the next populist uprising will be born in this moneyed quagmire.

It is here -- within the muck that was created by AIG, Citigroup, Fannie and Freddie, other giant financial institutions, now in combination with the U.S. Treasury and Fed -- that the public is most confused, bears its most serious scars, and is potentially most burdened in future years, by decisions still made in secret.

Bewert said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Bewert said...

Police Officer Loses Gun at Ski Area

03/03/09 Hoodoo

An off duty police officer lost a gun while skiing at Hoodoo. The officer works for Stayton police near Salem. He lost the off duty weapon during the winter carnival at Hoodoo. So far, the ski area says no one has found the handgun.

Anonymous said...

After all, their share prices were built on a tissue of lies and dreams

*

This is WHY buster tells you KUNTS to avoid the fucking stock-market, its going to well below DOW 4000, cuz it really is soiled tissue paper.

The lies are now over, once the $10's MILLIONS of BONUS no longer feeds the the LIARS ( MADE-OFF, SEC, ... ) then the house of cards will collapse.

Dreams? Dreams of 10%/yr ROI on your savings?? Dream?

The 401K is now a nightmare, a lunch bucket left out for the wolves to clean.

Bewert said...

Regence BlueCross seeks 19 pct. rate hike

SALEM - The Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services' Insurance Division is seeking public comment on a proposed health insurance rate increase of 19 percent that would affect more than 79,000 Regence BlueCross BlueShield individual plan policyholders.

The proposed 19 percent increase, effective July 1, 2009, would apply to policyholders who renew in July, August, or September. This is the same group that received a 26 percent average rate increase a year ago, following a 16 percent decrease in 2006. Individual plans cover one person or a family and are purchased directly from an insurance company and not provided through an employer.

Regence submitted the proposed increase this week. Because of the number of Oregonians involved and the size of the rate request, the Insurance Division is providing a month-long written comment period for anyone who would be affected by the outcome. The division will review comments it receives as part of its rate review process.

"We understand the impact that this rate increase would have on consumers," said Teresa Miller, acting administrator for the Insurance Division. "We want to make sure we consider all pertinent information before making a decision."

Comments on Regence's proposal must be received by April 3.

The division must follow state law in reviewing rate requests. The law (ORS 742.005) says rate filings will be disapproved if:
• They are prejudicial
• They are unjust, unfair or inequitable
• Benefits are not reasonable in relation to the premium charged

The division asks that comments address those three areas.

"As health care costs continue to rise, we want to inform and engage the public as much as possible," said Miller, adding that the public can view all health insurance rate filings on the division's Web site.

• To search for any rate filing, visit: http://insurance.oregon.gov/insurer/rates_forms/health_rate_filings/health-rate-filing-search.html

• To view this Regence rate request, visit: http://www4.cbs.state.or.us/ex/ins/filing/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.show_pdf&pdf=310 (Adobe Acrobat Reader required)

The department has proposed legislation that would create a public comment process for every rate request, as well as strengthen its rate review standards. For more information on these proposals, visit: http://insurance.oregon.gov/consumer/consumer-issues/regence-rate-increase/rate-review-reform-proposal-09.pdf (Adobe Acrobat Reader required)

Regence's rate request of a year ago was appealed by a Portland policyholder. The appeal was the subject of a hearing in February, and a final decision is expected in several months.

Here's how to comment on the pending request:
By mail: Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services
Insurance Division
Attn: Sue Munson
P.O. Box 14480
Salem, OR 97309-0405

Anonymous said...

Top Wall Streeters who raked in tens of millions of dollars a year for more than a decade have now effectively eviscerated the pension fund savings of millions of middle-class American workers and destroyed millions of Main Street jobs. The public is understandably appalled that its tax dollars are being used to pay and prop up the very people and institutions responsible for this debacle.

*

Crystal fucking clear!! So why the fuck is Geithner still in POWER? Even Rheich questions the intelligence of OREO.

One day OREO bails them out, the next day he rails against them, all fucking theater.

Soon all the money will be BEND-GONE, then what??

OREO is just doing what he's told, and the people who elected OREO and got him the 100's of million to win his office, used stolen fucking money, and he knows he has to win the fucking 2010, or otherwise the PUG's will take back congress and senate, so the OREO lets the crooks steal all they want, so the DEM's can stay in POWER.

In the meantime LIMBAUGH rallys the troops for a return to McCarthy-ism, ...

The show is getting good, all the while locally the cops run around killing grandma&grandpa, cuz everything is/was de-regulated, its a fucking free for all, do as you wish, there is no law, there is no moral high-ground, its every PIG for himself.

I hope the child who found the handgun on Hoodoo is smart enough to stash the thing in a deep hole with a good desiccant, in a sealed water-proof container. More than likely than child will not be able to legally buy a handgun when of age.

Anonymous said...

Regence BlueCross seeks 19 pct. rate hike

*

The trend will continue BP, as CEO's all become BILLIONAIRES, by stealing TRILLIONS from the US-Treasury.

The new OREO Dr-Rahmbo health-plan virtually guarantees that ALL health-insurance companys be bailed out forever, just like bank holding company's.

The real problem is 'insurance', the CDO, CDS, (credit-swaps) were just insurance, sold by AIG, buffete, lehman, ... and 'health insur' is the same racket, collect premium, and if there is ever a payout, then nationalize the expense.

Everybody loves insurance, everybody loves collecting premiums, but when it comes to paying the loss ( NATIONALIZE ).

Today the Geithner $100B/day that FED-RES is printing, is all to cover insurance losses.

Why were the fuckers even allowed to write MORE insurance than they had the ability to pay?

Secrecy like Rheich says above, secrecy continues.

Then there is GEITNHER, NOBODY will even take jobs now working under him, cuz ALL this shit is going to implode in the coming months, anybody at the SEC, FED-RES, US-TREAS, ... is going down.

Yes, the Wall-St doesn't know what to think, nobody knows what to think, but in the meantime Blue-X inc the premium, so the CEO can make more money, in these tough times.

Anonymous said...

Obama doesn't seem to know exactly what to make of it either. He seems to vacillate as well -- one moment scorning Wall Street, the next moment justifying further bailouts.

I do hope he takes a firmer hand, drawing a clearer distinction and making a clearer connection between clearing up these financial balance sheets and helping average people. Otherwise, the next populist uprising will be born in this moneyed quagmire.

*

Can't have a populist 'uprising', no way in hell, its NOT good for the elite, whether they be a clinton, rheich, or limbaugh.

Never been a better time to squirell away $10M/yr, and buy a gated mcMansion in a safe-country.

It's all sort of sad, Rheich, in many ways tells the truth, but when it comes to OBAMA, he fails to call him an incompetent coward. Well he says so implicitly, but come on.

Didn't Waffling used to be illegal??

Anonymous said...

Is Obama responsible for Wall Street's meltdown?

It's an absurd argument, but that's where populist rage on the right is heading.

###

Apu seems the other day 'bend surprised' that OREO is getting the blame? Well why not? Things really were better last summer, here it is now spring, and everything is going to shit. It's always the GUY in office that gets the blame.

'Populist Rage' scary shit coming from an intellectual like Rheich. The brains behind HRC&CO.

I don't see this however, Limbaugh doesn't tell his flock the truth, either does Cramer.

The average US citizen gets all his/her knowledge from TV, and that is CORP controlled NBC,ABC,FOX,... almost all military-industrial-complex.

Hardly populism.

Absurd? To blame the OREO? Well even Rheich came out and admitted that the OREO waffles ever fucking day.

All MODERN US politicians are HIRED HIT-MEN on the behalf of US-CORPORATIONS to loot the US treasury, been this way for a long time. Smart folk like Rheich see and end coming to their way of life. Especially if the US dollar goes to shit.

Absurd Populism? Not likely.

The BIG WAR is coming, that will take everyone's mind of the trivia of today.

Today the OREO needs to throw the left a bone, its called 'health care', and as always it will not mean shit. But at least he's sponsoring a debate, which is more than we got from BUSH.

It's all quite amusing, some folks fear losing their job or home, Rheich fears 'populism'.

It's all relative.

Anonymous said...

POPULISM??

WATCH THIS VIDEO

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Stewart_ignites_populism_against_CNBC_0305.html

Anonymous said...

Read KUNTS, READ, ..


Huey Long, & Obama, ...

Remembering Huey Long
by Christian Roselund

As the economic crisis deepens, our nation is continually reminded of the Great Depression. News articles and pundits regularly make comparisons to the troubled times of the 1930s, even if only to remind us that this disaster is not yet as bad. The recent passage of the $787 billion stimulus plan, with its focus on job creation, evokes memories of the New Deal with Obama cast as a new Roosevelt.
Memorial at the Huey Long gravesite. © Foist, flickr.com

However, in the story where the great hero Roosevelt takes bold action to help the needy in a time of crisis, we tend to miss the political forces with which he was forced to contend.

In our national mythology of that era, the most important character overlooked is the complicated Southern politician Huey P. Long, who presented a populist threat to Roosevelt, influenced the direction of New Deal legislation and left a political legacy that both provided for the poor and modernized the state of Louisiana. Unfortunately, when Long is remembered, it is usually as a distorted caricature, and the real impact of his work is lost.



FDR as reformer?

The national memory of FDR as an immediate champion of the people reflects a profound amnesia of larger political circumstances. Roosevelt was elected in 1932 with the support of sections of big business, including newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst. His first actions as president were to bail out large banks and cut veterans benefits. He mistrusted deficit spending and for the first two years showed inconsistent support for public works programs as a means to deal with unemployment. His most ambitious economic plan in the first year of his presidency, the National Industrial Recovery Act, favored larger businesses and did little to put the nation back to work. Barack Obama has far more aggressively attacked the issue of job creation.

It took two years for FDR to embrace long-term public works programs to put the unemployed to work and to create a permanent social safety net with programs such as the Works Progress Administration and Social Security. In that time the nation had changed. By the end of 1934, the United States was entering the sixth year of the Depression and radical movements were threatening national stability. A series of massive strikes had erupted, including general strikes in Minneapolis and San Francisco and a 700,000-strong strike of textile workers on the East Coast. Organizations of the unemployed were becoming more aggressive and in some cases joining with striking workers.

Many around the nation were beginning to follow charismatic leaders who proposed major changes to the American system. The most influential of these was Huey Long, who called for the radical redistribution of the nation's wealth.



Long’s Message and Legacy

A former traveling salesman from north-central Louisiana, Huey Long made a name for himself as a lawyer who would represent small plaintiffs against big opponents. He was elected to the state’s Railroad Commission (later renamed the Public Service Commission) at the age of 25, where he continued to win concessions from the biggest business interests in the state, including the Standard Oil Company. Long was elected Governor of Louisiana in 1928 and U.S. Senator in 1932. By this time he had perfected a political message that was to carry him to national prominence, the core of which can be heard in a radio speech delivered in early 1935.



“God invited us all to come and eat and drink all we wanted. He smiled on our land and we grew crops of plenty to eat and wear...God called: ‘Come to my feast.’ But what had happened? Rockefeller, Morgan, and their crowd stepped up and took enough for 120,000,000 people and left only enough for 5,000,000 for all the other 125,000,000 to eat. And so many millions must go hungry and without these good things God gave us unless we call on them to put some of it back.”



Long’s “Share the Wealth” proposal was premised on heavy taxation of the wealthiest Americans in order to pay for a national minimum income. Details were sparse, but Long’s message won him a huge national following as the champion of the poor in their fight against large banks and corporations, and their servants in Washington.

Long also delivered. As Louisiana’s governor, he taxed the oil industry to pay for free textbooks for all children, bridge the Mississippi, and expand public universities. Long’s roads program was the largest public works program in the South before the New Deal and it increased the mileage of paved roads in the state ten-fold, employing eight thousand men at its height and creating vital commercial improvements in the backward state.

Louisiana was never the same. Well beyond his tenure, candidates for state office fell primarily into two camps: pro-Long or anti-Long. Despite rampant corruption, Long’s successors sustained electoral support through expanding public services, like establishing a statewide system of free “Charity” hospitals.

Long’s impact was not confined to the South. As a senator, he was among Roosevelt’s fiercest critics, continually challenging the president to do more for poor and working people. In one example, when FDR cut veterans benefits and government worker salaries, Long denounced it as the work of J.P. Morgan and Rockefeller. By 1935 Long had created a national network of “Share the Wealth” clubs with millions of members nationwide, was appearing on national radio criticizing Roosevelt’s policies, and had written a book presumptously titled My First Days in the White House.

As early as 1933 Roosevelt described Long as “one of the two most dangerous men in the country” to key aides. However, Roosevelt had much more to worry about by 1935, when he commissioned a secret poll in advance of the 1936 election. The poll found that Long had national support and could potentially throw the election to a Republican. Seen in this light, Roosevelt's “shift to the left” in the Second New Deal is more than a change in conscience. When defending proposals including Social Security and the WPA, Roosevelt threatened Congress that the alternative was Huey Long.

Long also saw the Second New Deal as an attempt to co-opt his momentum, particularly a proposal to increase taxes on the wealthy and on inherited wealth. When Roosevelt’s 1935 Tax Act was read, Long strode through Senate chambers, pointing to his chest and laughing.

Six months later, Long’s political aspirations were stopped short by an assassin's bullet in Baton Rouge.



Mis-remembering Long

Long is rarely remembered for his progressive efforts. The most popular accounts of him tend to focus on style and not substance, most notably Robert Penn Warren's All the King’s Men, where he is represented by the sinister Willie Stark in a moralistic tale of personal corruption, an effectively de-politicized memory of Long.

There are legitimate criticisms of his record, of course. Long rode roughshod over democratic procedures in Louisiana and consolidated tremendous political power in his person. But in a state where African-Americans were almost universally disenfranchised and plantation and commercial elites had dominated state government for centuries, for the majority precious little democracy existed in Louisiana to be abused.

Long also did little to advance the rights of African-Americans. However, he was very different from the other leaders of poor whites in the South at that time in that he channeled white resentments against the wealthy and powerful instead of blacks. And as mostly poor residents of Louisiana, blacks often materially benefited from Long’s policies.

Despite these failings, Long had a profound impact on the lives of millions of poor and working people by virtue of his policies and the threat he posed. One of Long’s most ardent critics, Hodding Carter, wrote in 1949 that Long had “led a social-democratic revolution in Louisiana, and after his death the entire south was debated ground.”



Why Long is Relevant Today

More than any personal failing of Long’s, the most problematic aspect of his legacy is the way that class tensions were often absorbed by a movement centered on his person. The contemporary emphasis on Obama as a savior is not fundamentally different; in both cases citizens depend on the ballot box as the primary form of political activity, and cults of personality substitute for movements where ordinary people are more directly involved in social change.

Obama’s presidency is very different from Roosevelt’s not only in that he has already embraced job creation and deficit-spending policies reminiscent of the second New Deal, but also in that there is no significant pressure from the left. There is no Huey Long in America today, nor do radical elements in labor have the power they did in the 1930s. If oppressed groups take action, such as immigrants filling the streets of major cities on May 1, 2006, they typically do so only for a day. This low level of pressure means that Obama's policies will likely be pulled to the right and watered down, as was evidenced in the version of his stimulus package that the Senate produced.

Today the essence of Long’s reforms appears elsewhere; in particular Long’s petro-populism is echoed and expanded upon in Hugo Chavez’s policies in Venezuela. Coming from very different political traditions, Chavez calls it 21st Century socialism while Long claimed that he was saving capitalism from itself. However, in both cases charismatic, powerful leaders built broad support by using oil money to pay for expanded public services.

If Long is alive (albeit unknown) in Venezuela, he is dead in his home state. In New Orleans, Hurricane Katrina has been used as an excuse to further the destruction of the legacies of Long and Roosevelt, including the closing of New Orleans’ Charity Hospital and the advanced privatization of public services. And the state’s current Republican governor, Bobby Jindal, has tried to lead to the fight against Obama’s stimulus plans.

Amid these excesses of Neoliberalism, Long’s message has a new urgency. His call for redistribution of the nation’s wealth and for a society that provides basic services for all its members speaks to our current economic crisis, when so many have lost their homes and livelihoods and so many continue to be without affordable health care. After thirty years of growing income inequality, Long’s emphasis on class is timely. And as unemployment grows, bank executives give themselves exorbitant bonuses with money from the bailout, and Exxon-Mobil posts record annual profits, we should remember Huey Long.

We may not need a new Huey Long, but we do need a movement to address inequality. With all his flaws, Long was nothing less than a hero for bringing this message to the forefront of national politics, a message that is relevant today just as it was 75 years ago.

Anonymous said...

See FDR would have NEVER done shit if not for Long, thus in a twisted way if LIMBAUGH could talk like LONG, he could drive OREO towards thinking about something other than protecting CORP-USA.

Limbaugh has been accused of being a 'populist', and the OREO of course is an 'elitist'.

The thing that elitists fear most is 'populism'.

Anonymous said...

10 Similarities Between Ultra-Conservative Bend Republican's and Nazis

John W. Sammon
March 07, 2009

Before the election last November, a Frenchman (immigrant) who was canvassing for Barack Obama saw me in my yard working, and came over to ask me to vote for Obama. We got to talking about France, and I asked him if France had conservatives?

"Oh yes," he said with a serious expression. "They are called Fascists."

His candor was refreshing, to say the least. But there are indeed some similarities between the right wing of the GOP, and the most reprehensible regime ever inflicted on mankind, Hitler and his Nazi rat henchmen.

1. The general feeling, whether spoken out right, or kept not-so-subtly-hidden, of being better than others. Nazis, like Republicans, and Republicans, like Nazis, think they´re better. They´re white. They don´t like, not necessarily in this order of dislike, niggers, spics, gooks, zips (Koreans), dinks (Chinese), wops, Jew kikes, Japs, wet-back greasers, camel-jockeys and sand niggers (A-rabs), Frogs, foreigners, immigrants, faggots and butch lesbians, and a host of others. Republicans often talk about (white) Americans as though they´re God´s chosen people, the only people who matter (in the war in Iraq, no mention has ever been made of the number of Iraqis killed because they don´t matter). The Nazis of course called themselves the Master Race.

2. Religious Xenophobia. God is a Republican. The Republicans tie religious belief to their supposed superiority, and to politics and policy-setting. They know God. You don´t. God favors them, not you, if you disagree with them. The German Nazis had belt buckles that read, "Gott Mitt Uns" (God is with us).

3. Patriotism as propaganda. Republicans consistently and improperly display the flag, often from car antennas, to demonstrate their patriotic resolve, when the flag was meant to be displayed properly, only in places where decorum would allow dignity. The flag was not meant to be a feckless political prop to back a right wing world viewpoint. For their part, the German Nazis had rallies with thousands of flags.

4. Love of war. The Republicans used to pride themselves as the party that didn´t start wars, the Democrats did. No more. Today, they never saw a war they didn´t like (they won´t admit it), and view war not as a purely defensive measure as the Founding Fathers intended, but as a useful tool, an instrument of shaping foreign policy. The German Nazis use of war is well known to the world.



5. Love of radio propaganda. Political talk radio is a largely right-wing creation, to counter what conservatives endlessly contend is the liberally biased mainstream media, and has mushroomed across the country, fed by angry white boys who like to listen to it. It is hosted by a host of American Joseph Goebbels (German minister of propaganda) imitators, who dispense false accusations, right-wing claptrap and mocking, thinly-disguised hate for those who disagree with them. Their most recognizable traits are smugness and the school-yard bully mean spirit.

6. The cult of the leader (fuehrer). Democrats may praise the tough pluck of little Harry Truman, or the dignified wisdom of FDR, but mythologizing conservatives as some kind of gods brought down from on-high is a right-wing phenomenon that has recently grown in scope. Current deification efforts include among others, Ronald Reagan, John Wayne and the pre-posthumous Rush Limbaugh. The Germans of course had Hitler.

7. Use of diversions. The Germans used the Reichstag fire of 1933 to suspend civil liberties under emergency decree. George W. Bush used 9-11 to invade Iraq under the guise of false weapons of mass destruction, and to re-make the Middle East. He did illegal wire taps of American citizens to make Americans supposedly safer. Both German and American citizens largely accepted these measures with docility and without debate or protest.

8. Use of scapegoats. The Germans called people they didn´t like "sub-humans." The right-wing Republicans call them "bad Americans."

9. Contempt for Democracy. Hitler said Democracy was corrupt, soft. Bush said being a dictator would be easier than being president.

10. The blame game, or denial of bad news. Conservatives, in power for eight years, blame Obama for the country´s impending economic collapse. Hitler said his generals let him down.

Anonymous said...

All roads lead to Rome?

Not anymore, these days most roads lead to Sisters, ...

Remember those names "Lundgren" & "Dyer", as important as HOLLERN is to Bend.



Laurence Dyer loves calling Sisters home


By Jim Cornelius

A lot of water has rolled down the Metolius River since Laurence Dyer first cast a line into the stream in the late 1930s. The years have brought many changes, but Dyer still finds the Sisters/Camp Sherman area the only place in the world where he wants to be.

Dyer first visited the area as a boy in the 1930s, when his uncle was a sawyer at one of the local sawmills and his aunt was a cook for logging crews.
“My brother and I used to come out in the summers and visit with them,” Dyer recalled.

Those visits were curtailed by gas rationing during World War II, but after the war he started coming back. That’s when he met his future wife Betty, whose parents owned a resort in Camp Sherman where the Kokanee Café now stands.

The couple married in 1951 and moved permanently to Camp Sherman. Laurence worked as a caretaker and assistant for Leonard Lundgren, who owned property in Camp Sherman and a lumber mill in Sisters.
In those days there was no electrical power to Camp Sherman; everything ran off water turbines. Laurence remembers the march of electrical power lines across eastern Oregon in the 1950s — a development that changed the region.

“I don’t know how in the world they did so much line construction in such a short time,” he said.

Dyer did business with all of the pioneering families in Sisters. He recalls buying supplies at the Leithauser General Store, which is now Sisters Bakery.

“We bought all our groceries from Pete (Leithauser),” he said. “That was a huge store at the time.”

Dyer, who later became prominent in Sisters’ real estate market, recalls having to pass on an opportunity in the 1960s. He was offered an opportunity to buy a lot in the heart of downtown Sisters “for $220 or something like that.”
He had to pass on what is now a prime piece of real estate because “we didn’t have any money.”

Dyer’s job working for the Lundgren family wound down just as Sisters’ mills were closing down. The only real business centered around the Forest Service.

Dyer marks the creation of Black Butte Ranch as a watershed moment for Sisters.

“From the time Black Butte Ranch came into existence is when Sisters really changed,” he said.

Sisters created its Western theme and a tourist-oriented community started to evolve.

In 1980, Dyer and several of his children obtained real estate licenses and started what would become a new family business. The family eventually established Ponderosa Properties in 1991.

Dyer is now basically retired from the business. He lives on several acres of Sisters with his children’s homes nearby. He and Betty consider themselves unusually blessed to have family so close that they get to see their grandchildren every day.

Laurence devotes considerable time to woodworking, creating exquisite chests and furniture pieces that he often donates to fund-raising auctions for various causes in Sisters. He never sells any of his work.

Each day, he can walk out to his shop and take in the magnificence of the Three Sisters and remember why he decided to build a life here so many decades ago.

He’s seen a lot of change and development in Sisters. He doesn’t much like the higher-density development that has occurred inside the city limits in the past eight years or so, but he understands why it has happened.

“There’s tremendous pressure on all the cities for development,” he said.
Of course, that’s mainly because so many people want to live here and partake of the beauty and quality of life the area has to offer. Dyer notes that a world-traveling client of his has told him more than once that “there’s no place like Central Oregon.”

Anonymous said...

The Boss Hogg of Sisters speaks out about tacky-western false fronts, and tourism, and events. It's interesting that partners Swizter(SORE)&Fadely(Sisters), run the events for BEND&SISTER's ...

“From the time Black Butte Ranch ( Hollern 1960's ) came into existence is when Sisters really changed,” he said.

Sisters created its Western theme and a tourist-oriented community started to evolve.

In 1980, Dyer and several of his children obtained real estate licenses and started what would become a new family business. The family eventually established Ponderosa Properties in 1991.

...

Today Sisters is infamous as a cotton candy truck stop, where a trucker can buy second hand underwear. Ponderosa Properties controls all, and is currently trying to build the biggest STD housing tract in Orygun in Metolius.

They can no longer sell Sisters, but their is money in them hills west of Sisters.

Anonymous said...

Limbaugh has been accused of being a 'populist', and the OREO of course is an 'elitist'.

The obese drug-addled pervert Flush Rimbowl lives in a multimillion-dollar mansion that he never leaves except to travel a couple of blocks to his studio and fly to the Dominican Republic to patronize child prostitutes. He has less contact with "the people" on a regular basis than the modern pope or the ancient emperors of China living inside the Forbidden City.

"Populist" my ass.

Anonymous said...

That's funny HBM, but true, and I agree when Flush finally goes down it will be the way of Fatty Arbuckle, some little boy will die from having a coke bottle shoved up his, and flush like Michael Jackson, will not be able to buy the parents off.

The 'populist' thing is only funny cuz its the fear of the 'elitists'.

A notable journalist the other day cornered George Will, and demanded he define 'conservative', and he refused, Ron Paul has much to say about 'real' conservatives.

A real conservative would have bashed BUSH, flushBowl heaped praise on BUSH, bush got us into wars and destroyed the economy, and flushRimbowl was silent.

Ron Paul is pissed, and has offered to 'debate' flush and shut him down for good.

This could be the beginning of a real debate, and sadly it might back-fire on OREO if his opposition dumps flushRimbah.

http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2009/03/07/whos-afraid-of-rush-limbaugh-not-ron-paul/

Anonymous said...

Limbaugh's weekly audience has spiked from 14.2 million to about 25 million since the controversy escalated.

*

OREO has brought HOPE & CHANGE to amkeriKKKa, now more makeriKKKan than ever are listening to Limbaugh.

OREO needs to move the limbaugh right to justifiy his GIETHNER, and thus moves the entire country towards limbaugh, which then makes the 'more bush than bush' OREO appear moderate, well compared to LIMBAUGH,

OREO must do this in order to keep spending TRILLIONS on bankers and insurance companys, and to justify his war in IRAN, PAKI, & Afghan.

Anonymous said...

I'm afraid OUR pussy's may have been correct in their talking-points a month ago. Its pretty clear that El-Rushblo has become the default GOP leader. Now that Rahmbo has his strawman, now what??

Until a leader steps up, Limbaugh is the head of the GOP
By Jimmy Orr | 03.04.09



Make no mistake. Right now, Rush Limbaugh is the leader of the Republican party.

No other Republican is getting any attention, and you can credit whomever you want.

Maybe it is the brilliant scheming of Rahm Emanuel, David Plouffe, Paul Begala, and James Carville. They seem to think so.

Laundry list

Maybe it is the vacuum of Republican leadership due to any number of factors including:


A) Bobby Jindal’s dismal performance delivering the Republican response to Obama’s address to Congress.
B) Sarah Palin’s decision to lie low.
C) Michael Steele’s inexplicable strategy of taking on Limbaugh.
D) The inexplicable and unbelievable strategy of putting Joe the Plumber on a pedestal.
E) House Minority Leader John Boehner apparently auditioning for and winning the part of The Invisible Man.
F) The media. Of course you have to blame the media.
G) Rush Limbaugh himself.


It probably is a combination of all of these points.

And until someone else steps up – like an elected official that can articulate what the GOP stands for — it’s going to stay that way.

McLovin’ it

Limbaugh doesn’t mind it. He’s having fun. He’s totally in his element.

Today, he took it all a step further. On his radio show, he did the equivalent of saying “meet me in the church parking lot down by the dumpsters at 3 pm.” He called the president out.

“If these guys are so impressed with themselves,” he said of Emanuel and his team. “And if they are so sure of their correctness, why doesn’t President Obama come on my show? We will do a one-on-one debate of ideas and policies,” he said.

Points

Limbaugh rattled off a number of items he’d like to discuss with President Obama including the economy, Guantanamo Bay, health care, the stock market, ACORN, unions, etc.

“Just come on this program,” Limbaugh taunted. “Let’s have a little debate. You tell me how wrong I am and you can convince the rest of the Americans that don’t agree with you how wrong we all are. You’re a smart guy, Mr. President. You don’t need these hacks to front for you.”

No ballet, please

Calling Obama one of the “most gifted speakers of our age,” Limbaugh said he wasn’t interested in debating Begala or Carville or Emanuel (calling him “the ballerina”).

“These people, compared to you, Mr. President, are rhetorical chum,” he said.

No news from the White House yet.

Dems winning?

Although it may seem like this is playing into the hands of the Democrats, not everyone on the left is seeing it that way.

Take Susan Estrich, for example. She’s citing history. You can’t beat Rush, she says.

“He talks for hours every day. He gets paid to talk. Just talk. Doing it well is no small thing; witness the number of people who have tried to be him, or be the NOT-him, and failed,” Estrich writes.

Not buying

Former Hillary Clinton adviser Peter Daou has his doubts too. “I don’t buy into this ‘brilliant’ strategy of elevating Rush Limbaugh,” he writes.

“I know it’s hard for Democrats to appreciate how quickly political fortunes turn – the glow of victory, the high of electoral success gives a sense of inevitability and invincibility, of permanence. But there’s nothing permanent about power. The tide will turn again, and the engine that will drive it is the fury stirred by the likes of Limbaugh. Feeding that machine, expanding and enhancing it is a mistake. A serious one.”

But don’t tell that to Paul Begala. He’s pretty proud of himself.

“I want to send Rush a bottle of vitamins,” said Begala in Politico. “We need him to stay healthy and loud and proud.”

Circus

Regardless of who’s winning and who’s losing, this isn’t going away anytime soon. Limbaugh will continue to talk about it. MSNBC and Fox will play this to the hilt. And Robert Gibbs isn’t going to be able to fend this off. He seems to like it so far. Let’s see how it wears on him

Anonymous said...

The OREO's SECRET WEAPON in PAKI, IRAN, AFGHAN, and IRAQ is now clear, as with CHENEY-BUSH, the OREO is MORE CHENEY than CHENEY.

No wonder that Black-Water lost the contract, ...


Why 10,000 Ugandans are eagerly serving in Iraq

Thousands of men and women from poverty-stricken Uganda risk their lives for $600 a month in Iraq.
By Max Delany | Contributor to The Christian Science Monitor

from the March 6, 2009 edition

Kampala, Uganda - Under a relentless equatorial sun and the gaze of her Zimbabwean instructor, Juliet Kituye quickly reassembles her AK-47. Next to her, a young man in a ripped red T-shirt discharges imaginary rounds at an invisible target.

On a disused soccer pitch in the suburbs of the Ugandan capital, Kampala, 300 hopefuls are being put through rudimentary firearms training. Many of the recruits are raw and their drills occasionally lurch towards slapstick. One trainee lets the magazine slip out of his automatic rifle and onto the red earth, someone else about turns right instead of left. All of them share the same dream, however: going to Iraq.

As President Barack Obama announces plans to withdraw US troops from Iraq, thousands of young Ugandans are increasingly desperate to be sent to the war-torn country. Already, the Ugandan government says there are more than 10,000 men and women from this poverty-stricken East African nation working as private security guards in Iraq. Hired out to multibillion-dollar companies for hundreds of dollars a month, they risk their lives seeking fortunes protecting US Army bases, airports, and oil firms.

The war in Iraq is the most privatized conflict in history. Since the invasion in 2003, the US Department of Defense has doled out contracts worth an estimated $100 billion to private firms. Covering a vast range of services from catering to dry cleaning to security, one in every five dollars the US spends in Iraq ends up in the pockets of the contractors, according to a report by the Congressional Budget Office. Increasingly these jobs have been outsourced to developing countries.

It is clear why the US contractors came to Uganda. As an impoverished former British colony, the country is awash with unemployed and English-speaking potential recruits. Its pliant government was an early member of President Bush's "coalition of the willing," and with a lingering 20-year insurgency, it also has a glut of experienced army veterans, who made up the initial contingent of Ugandans in Iraq.

More important, hiring Ugandans is cheap. Since the first Ugandans were sent to Iraq in late 2005, competition from other developing countries in Africa and the Indian subcontinent has seen the government cut the minimum wage from $1,300 to $600 a month. That compares with the $15,000 that one industry insider estimated an American guard could make each month. Nevertheless, competition is fierce, and for those Ugandans who land a job, Iraq can prove a bonanza.

Paul Mugabe is back in Uganda for a month. For the past year, the sinewy, nervous young man has been guarding the American Camp Diamondback at the airport in the northern Iraqi town of Mosul, and soon he will be heading to Baghdad.

"It's not like Uganda. You sweat and sweat and sweat," says Mr. Mugabe, a former soldier in the Ugandan Army. "It is the most dangerous place in the world. It's even worse than Congo."

With the money he's earned during those 12 months, back in his village Mugabe has built himself two houses, bought a bar, and increased the herd of cows his father left him to 30.

"You should see the size of my banana plantation," he smiles. When he returns from another year in Iraq, he should have saved enough money to cover a wedding and the traditional bride price needed to find a pretty wife, he says.

But despite his nascent business empire and hopes of love, the fact that he is putting his life on the line to help US companies make massive profits is not lost on him. "If I am earning $600 a month and these companies are making billions, it is not fair," he says.

For Uganda, however, another country's war on a continent far away has proved to be lucrative. "The Iraq opportunity brings in about $90 million dollars, whereas our chief export, which is coffee, brings in around $60 or $70 million a year," says the former state minister for labor, employment, and industrial relations, Mwesigwa Rukutana, now minister of higher education. That figure is mostly made up of remittances.

But domestic criticism has been fierce, with some equating the system to human trafficking or slavery. Reports of abuse, ranging from poor conditions and changeable contracts to sexual assault, have appeared in the media.

"Unlike in the past when there was the slave trade, no company comes here and recruits anyone against their wishes. It is willing worker, willing employer," Mr. Rukutana says. "If anyone thinks the conditions there are bad or that he is going to be exploited, no one is compelling him to go." Rukutana says that only one Ugandan has been killed in Iraq, while others say more have died.

If anyone understands some of the hardships of working in Iraq and the industry it's spawned, then it is Moses Matsiko. Mr. Matsiko has spent nearly four years working for a US firm in Afghanistan and Iraq. In late 2006, a convoy he was escorting through the town of Fallujah was ambushed. He was shot seven times but survived. Two American colleagues he was with were killed.

But far from shy away from the dangers of Iraq, Matsiko has embraced its opportunities. In 2007, he started his own company to train and send guards to Iraq and now has over 1,200 in the country.

"My experience in Iraq is that despite having been shot seven times, it is very great," he says. President Obama's withdrawal plans have cast a shadow of doubt over his future business plans. But that has just forced Matsiko to start looking opportunities elsewhere.

"If all goes well, then I hope to be sending people to Afghanistan in the near future," he smiles.

Bewert said...

The Rick Santelli 'Tea Party' Controversy: Article Kicks Up a Media Dust Storm

By Mark Ames and Yasha Levine, eXiled Online. Posted March 3, 2009.

Editor's Note: "I hope that the president and the final stimulus plan succeed." So writes CNBC pundit Rick Santelli in a recent public statement, one that's very much at odds with his on-screen persona as an instigator of a right-wing protest movement against Barack Obama's economic recovery plans. This is the man whose outraged rant against Obama's plan for distressed homeowners was viewed millions of times on CNBC.com and YouTube and sparked a backlash in the form of "Tea Parties" across the United States.

Santelli's reversal resulted from the controversy surrounding a Playboy article by journalists Mark Ames and Yasha Levine. The article, which was later taken down from Playboy's site after possible libel claims, exposed the connection between the right-wing group FreedomWorks and the online Tea Party organizers, and suggested that Santelli's tirade was a "carefully planned trigger" for the Tea Parties.

In addition to his public statement on CNBC, Santelli suffered the ignominy of canceling an appearance on Jon Stewart's The Daily Show this week, and further revelations and accusations are flying between Ames and Levine's ExiledOnline Web magazine and the New York Times and Atlantic Monthly blog, among others.

In a statement on the controversy, sent to me in the afternoon on March 3, Ames and Levine write:

"There has been a lot of speculation as to why Playboy removed our original article from its site. Let us put it this way: When you look at the fallout from our article -- FreedomWorks admits its role in the teaparty, Santelli issues a giant lawyer-penned opus about how he loves Obama, and CNBC (whose parent company is the megaconglomerate General Electric) frightens a bunch of Astroturfing Web sites into dropping Santelli's name and into revealing their own PAC sponsors -- then it's clear we hit the bull's-eye and stirred up the wrath of a very scary monster.

"Given all of this, it would not be unreasonable for one to consider the possibility (as many have) that the multigazilliondollar megabeast GE threatened the much smaller independent media company Playboy with a terrifying and expensive lawsuit, which, given the current financial crisis, is not something anyone but another GE-sized megabeast could cope with. 'Nuf said on that.
"

Ames and Levine summarize the controversy on their site:

"We publish an investigation into the fake-grassroots "Tea Party" protest campaign underwritten by rich Republican right-wing interests, exposing Rick Santelli's role as the launch event MC, and three days later, Santelli is bitch-slapped down by his bosses, he's canceled from the Daily Show, forced to issue a Bukharin-like confession, FreedomWorks confesses that it was behind it from the start, as we wrote, and every media outlet in the country from the New York Times on down is writing up the scandal.

"Yes, it's a victory for us and for the forces of independent journalism. Sure, we're doing a dirty chicken dance in the end zone now. But the truth is, it's a bitter victory, because we've also been forced to confront the awfully familiar face of America's own version of the Soviet Union at work: Giant scary corporations threatening and scaring smaller fish into censorship, while their bought-off minions in the media do their dirty work to try to protect the megaconglomerate's brand."

Ames' and Levine's story has also highlighted the various media conflicts of interest caused by overlapping business ties between the companies involved and reporting on the controversy. It also revealed that apparent critics of Ames' and Levine's report are tied to the subjects of the controversy. For example, Playboy has a deal in the works with NBC Universal, CNBC's corporate parent, for an upcoming film titled Playboy. The New York Times had to disclose that it has a content-sharing agreement with CNBC in its story on Santelli.

While attacking the overall credibility of the original story, Atlantic Monthly blogger Megan McArdle -- who confirmed from FreedomWorks that it has indeed been involved in organizing the Tea Parties as Ames and Levine alleged in their story -- disclosed that she lived with a man who used to work for FreedomWorks and that he had engaged in the same kind of Astroturf PR stunts for the group that Ames and Levine reported on in their article. -- Jan Frel, AlterNet Senior Editor

The following is the text of Ames' and Levine's original report, originally published on Feb. 27.

****

Last week, CNBC correspondent Rick Santelli rocketed from being a little-known second-string correspondent to a populist hero of the disenfranchised, a 21st-century Samuel Adams, the leader and symbol of the downtrodden American masses suffering under the onslaught of 21st century socialism and big government. Santelli's "rant" last-week calling for a "Chicago Tea Party" to protest President Obama's plans to help distressed American homeowners rapidly spread across the blogosphere and shot right up into White House spokesman Robert Gibbs' craw, whose smackdown during a press conference was later characterized by Santelli as "a threat" from the White House. A nationwide "tea party" grassroots Internet protest movement has sprung up seemingly spontaneously, all inspired by Santelli, with rallies planned today in cities from coast to coast to protest against Obama's economic policies.

But was Santelli's rant really so spontaneous? How did a minor-league TV figure, whose contract with CNBC is due this summer, get so quickly launched into a nationwide rightwing blog sensation? Why were there so many sites and organizations online and live within minutes or hours after his rant, leading to a nationwide protest just a week after his rant?

What hasn't been reported until now is evidence linking Santelli's "tea party" rant with some very familiar names in the Republican rightwing machine, from PR operatives who specialize in imitation-grassroots PR campaigns (called "astroturfing") to bigwig politicians and notorious billionaire funders. As veteran Russia reporters, both of us spent years watching the Kremlin use fake grassroots movements to influence and control the political landscape. To us, the uncanny speed and direction the movement took and the players involved in promoting it had a strangely forced quality to it. If it seemed scripted, that's because it was.

What we discovered is that Santelli's "rant" was not at all spontaneous as his alleged fans claim, but rather it was a carefully-planned trigger for the anti-Obama campaign. In PR terms, his February 19th call for a "Chicago Tea Party" was the launch event of a carefully organized and sophisticated PR campaign, one in which Santelli served as a frontman, using the CNBC airwaves for publicity, for the some of the craziest and sleaziest rightwing oligarch clans this country has ever produced. Namely, the Koch family, the multibillionaire owners of the largest private corporation in America, and funders of scores of rightwing thinktanks and advocacy groups, from the Cato Institute and Reason Magazine to FreedomWorks. The scion of the Koch family, Fred Koch, was a co-founder of the notorious extremist-rightwing John Birch Society.

As you read this, Big Business is pouring tens of millions of dollars into their media machines in order to destroy just about every economic campaign promise Obama has made, as reported recently in the Wall Street Journal. At stake isn't the little guy's fight against big government, as Santelli and his bot-supporters claim, but rather the "upper 2 percent's war to protect their wealth from the Obama Adminstration's economic plans. When this Santelli "grassroots" campaign is peeled open, what's revealed is a glimpse of what is ahead and what is bound to be a hallmark of his presidency.

Let's go back to February 19th: Rick Santelli, live on CNBC, standing in the middle of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, launches into an attack on the just-announced $300 billion slated to stem rate of home foreclosures: "The government is promoting bad behavior! Do we really want to subsidize the losers' mortgages?! This is America! We're thinking of having a Chicago tea party in July, all you capitalists who want to come down to Lake Michigan, I'm gonna start organizing."

Almost immediately, the clip and the unlikely "Chicago tea party" quote buried in the middle of the segment, zoomed across a well-worn path to headline fame in the Republican echo chamber, including red-alert headlines on Drudge.

Within hours of Santelli's rant, a website called ChicagoTeaParty.com sprang to life. Essentially inactive until that day, it now featured a YouTube video of Santelli's "tea party" rant and billed itself as the official home of the Chicago Tea Party. The domain was registered in August, 2008 by Zack Christenson, a dweeby Twitter Republican and producer for a popular Chicago rightwing radio host Milt Rosenberg—a familiar name to Obama campaign people. Last August, Rosenberg, who looks like Martin Short's Irving Cohen character, caused an outcry when he interviewed Stanley Kurtz, the conservative writer who first "exposed" a personal link between Obama and former Weather Undergound leader Bill Ayers. As a result of Rosenberg's radio interview, the Ayers story was given a major push through the Republican media echo chamber, culminating in Sarah Palin's accusation that Obama was "palling around with terrorists." That Rosenberg's producer owns the "chicagoteaparty.com" site is already weird—but what's even stranger is that he first bought the domain last August, right around the time of Rosenburg's launch of the "Obama is a terrorist" campaign. It's as if they held this "Chicago tea party" campaign in reserve, like a sleeper-site. Which is exactly what it was.

ChicagoTeaParty.com was just one part of a larger network of Republican sleeper-cell-blogs set up over the course of the past few months, all of them tied to a shady rightwing advocacy group coincidentally named the "Sam Adams Alliance," whose backers have until now been kept hidden from public. Cached google records that we discovered show that the Sam Adams Alliance took pains to scrub its deep links to the Koch family money as well as the fake-grassroots "tea party" protests going on today. All of these roads ultimately lead back to a more notorious rightwing advocacy group, FreedomWorks, a powerful PR organization headed by former Republican House Majority leader Dick Armey and funded by Koch money.

On the same day as Santelli's rant, February 19, another site called Officialchicagoteaparty.com went live. This site was registered to Eric Odom, who turned out to be a veteran Republican new media operative specializing in imitation-grassroots PR campaigns. Last summer, Odom organized a twitter-led campaign centered around DontGo.com to pressure Congress and Nancy Pelosi to pass the offshore oil drilling bill, something that would greatly benefit Koch Industries, a major player in oil and gas. Now, six months later, Odom's DontGo movement was resurrected to play a central role in promoting the "tea party" movement.

Up until last month, Odom was officially listed as the "new media coordinator" for the Sam Adams Alliance, a well-funded libertarian activist organization based in Chicago that was set up only recently. Samuel Adams the historical figure was famous for inspiring and leading the Boston Tea Party—so when the PR people from the Chicago-based Sam Adams Alliance abruptly leave in order to run Santelli's "Chicago Tea Party," you know it wasn't spontaneous. Odom certainly doesn't want people to know about the link: his name was scrubbed from the Sam Adams Alliance website recently, strongly suggesting that they wanted to cover their tracks. Thanks to google caching, you can see the SAA's before-after scrubbing.

Even the Sam Adams' January 31 announcement that Odom's fake-grassroots group was "no longer sponsored by the Alliance" was shortly afterwards scrubbed.

But it's the Alliance's scrubbing of their link to Koch that is most telling. A cached page, erased on February 16, just three days before Santelli's rant, shows that the Alliance also wanted to cover up its ties to the Koch family. The missing link was an announcement that students interested in applying for internships to the Sam Adams Alliance could also apply through the "Charles G. Koch Summer Fellow Program" through the Institute for Humane Studies, a Koch-funded rightwing institute designed to scout and nurture future leaders of corporate libertarian ideology. (See hi-resolution screenshots here.) The top two board directors at the Sam Adams Alliance include two figures with deep ties to Koch-funded programs: Eric O'Keefe, who previously served in Koch's Institute for Humane Studies and the Club For Growth; and Joseph Lehman, a former communications VP at Koch's Cato Institute.

All of these are ultimately linked up to Koch's Freedom Works mega-beast. FreedomWorks.org has drawn fire in the past for using fake grassroots internet campaigns, called "astroturfing," to push for pet Koch projects such as privatizing social security. A New York Times investigation in 2005 revealed that a "regular single mom" paraded by Bush's White House to advocate for privatizing social security was in fact FreedomWorks' Iowa state director. The woman, Sandra Jacques, also fronted another Iowa fake-grassroots group called "For Our Grandchildren," even though privatizing social security was really "For Koch And Wall Street Fat Cats."

If you log into FreedomWorks.org today, its home page features a large photo of Rick Santelli pointing at the viewer like Uncle Sam, with the words: "Are you with Rick? We Are. Click here to learn more."

FreedomWorks, along with scores of shady front organizations which don't have to disclose their sponsors thanks to their 501 (c)(3) status, has been at the heart of today's supposed grassroots, nonpartisan "tea party" protests across the country, supposedly fueled by scores of websites which masquerade as amateur/spontaneous projects, but are suspiciously well-crafted and surprisingly well-written. One slick site pushing the tea parties, Right.org claims, "Right.org is a grassroots online community created by a few friends who were outraged by the bailouts. So we gathered some talent and money and built this site. Please tell your friends, and if you have suggestions for improving it, please let us know. Respectfully, Evan and Duncan." But funny enough, these regular guys are offering a $27,000 prize for an "anti-bailout video competition." Who are Evan and Duncan? Do they even really exist?

Even Facebook pages dedicated to a specific city "tea party" events, supposedly written by people connected only by a common emotion, obviously conformed to the same style. It was as if they were part of a multi-pronged advertising campaign planned out by a professional PR company. Yet, on the surface, they pretended to have no connection. The various sites set up their own Twitter feeds and Facebook pages dedicated to the Chicago Tea Party movement. And all of them linked to one another, using it as evidence that a decentralized, viral movement was already afoot. It wasn't about partisanship; it was about real emotions coming straight from real people.

While it's clear what is at stake for the Koch oligarch clan and their corporate and political allies—fighting to keep the hundreds of billions in surplus profits they've earned thanks to pro-rich economic policies over the past 30 years—what's a little less obvious is Santelli's link to all this. Why would he (and CNBC) risk their credibility, such as it is, as journalists dispensing financial information in order to act as PR fronts for a partisan campaign?

As noted above, Santelli's contract with CNBC runs out in a few months. His 10 years with the network haven't been remarkable, and he'll enter a brutal downsizing media job market. Thanks to the "tea party" campaign, as the article notes, Santelli's value has suddenly soared. If you look at the scores of blogs and fake-commenters on blogs (for example, Daily Blog, a slick new blog launched in January which is also based in Chicago) all puff up Santelli like he's the greatest journalist in America, and the greatest hero known to mankind. Daily Bail, like so much of this "tea party" machine, is "headquartered nearby" to Santelli, that is, in Chicago. With Odom, the Sam Adams Alliance, and the whole "tea party" nexus: "Rick, this message is to you. You are a true American hero and there are no words to describe what you did today except your own. Headquartered nearby, we will be helping the organization in whatever way possible."

It's not difficult to imagine how Santelli hooked up with this crowd. A self-described "Ayn Rand-er," one of Santelli's colleagues at CNBC, Lawrence Kudlow, played a major role in both FreedomWorks and the Club for Growth.

So today's protests show that the corporate war is on, and this is how they'll fight it: hiding behind "objective" journalists and "grassroots" new media movements. Because in these times, if you want to push for policies that help the super-wealthy, you better do everything you can to make it seem like it's "the people" who are "spontaneously" fighting your fight. As a 19th century slave management manual wrote, "The master should make it his business to show his slaves, that the advancement of his individual interest, is at the same time an advancement of theirs. Once they feel this, it will require little compulsion to make them act as becomes them." (Southern Agriculturalist IX, 1836.) The question now is, will they get away with it, and will the rest of America advance the interests of Koch, Santelli, and the rest of the masters?

###

Corps are fighting back, hard. The one thing they don't completely control, yet, is this thing call the Net.

Anonymous said...

Why HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES ARE THE PROBLEM!

Health insurance companies are not THE problem. They are only a part of the problem, and the problem is our profit-driven (or should I say "profit-mad"?) health care system.

Actually it isn't a "health care system" at all -- it's a system for the maximally efficient extraction of money from patients in return for the minimum amount of care and effort. And everybody takes his slice out of the patient's hide -- the insurance companies, the hospitals and other health care facilities, the doctors, the pharma companies.

Gouge, gouge, gouge, all the way down the line. Shuffle the patients through the "system" as quickly as possible, pick their pockets and send them on their way.

The for-profit health care system in the US has broken down and needs to be replaced STAT. If that means "socialized medicine," so be it. I'm far less afraid of "socialized medicine" than I am of the totally fucked up situation we have now. We spend more (per capita and as a share of GDP) on "health care" than any other developed nation and have less to show for it. It's a crime and a disgrace.

Anonymous said...

So today's protests show that the corporate war is on, and this is how they'll fight it: hiding behind "objective" journalists and "grassroots" new media movements.

The big problem for the plutes is that their crapitalist dogma has so colossally and demonstrably FAILED that it's pretty tough to scare Americans with that old "socialism" bogyeman anymore.

Anonymous said...

isn't a "health care system" at all -- it's a system for the maximally efficient extraction of money from patients in return for the minimum amount of care and effort.

*

Yes, HBM, but under OREO & DR-RAHMBO they want to MANDATE med-insur, ..

Just admit HBM for the record, 'single payer', then we don't need health-insur.

Today health-insur is a WALL.

Anonymous said...

NOPE, HBM, its far MORE cruel, than your letting on, ...

See GE is going down, GECC has drawn the 120+ yr company to its knees.

Today GE has $800B in assets, most being TOXIC, and GE makes the NUKE's, missiles, and machine-guns that makes the US machine HUMM, and GE owns cnbc, and all your favorite drivel on TV.

So GE needs OREO bail-out and BAD, so GE gets all of its "Dog's of War", like Santelli to go ape shit over ma&pa kettle getting to keep their house.

The trouble is NOW we got to bailout GE, like we did AIG, & GM, ...

It's going to get very ugly, especially as GE is going to have to sell CNBC to raise cash to pay the electric bill.

Anonymous said...

The big problem for the plutes is that their crapitalist dogma has so colossally and demonstrably FAILED that it's pretty tough to scare Americans with that old "socialism" bogyeman anymore.

*

Well I would not shed too many crocodile tears for the plutocrats ( kleptocrats of bend ), cuz until OREO fire's Geithner, the plutes are going to keep racking in the greatest heist in human history, and there is no sign of abatement on the horizon.

Anonymous said...

An over looked argument regarding 'ma&pa kettle' that is frequently over-looked.

Folks like to BASH chevron, exxon, GE, and hell even P&G.

But hell the MAJORITY owner of said companys is 'ma&pa' 401k retirement 'kettles', but NOW with the complete 401k fire-sale, old-near-dead folks from post-1950's think that what is good for GE is good for ameriKKKa "So long as I'm getting my dividend", all supported the vietnam war, and all else. ...

But NOW, NOW that the US PENSION EMPIRE is imploding, 'Harriet&Louise' are no longer calling their congressman about protecting GE and their way of pension life.

IN the coming months when ALL old fucks learn their pension is BEND-GONE, they'll turn on FORTURE-100,

FOLKS its going to be a blood bath, but then, its only toilet paper.

Anonymous said...

"grassroots" new media movements.

*

HL MENCKEN said it best

"Every time I see a man wave a flag, I expect to get a bill"

Anonymous said...

Second, it's inevitable that stocks, led by the bloated financial sector, would lose their remaining hot air as the new administration begins "stress-testing" the big banks, many of which are technically insolvent. After all, their share prices were built on a tissue of lies and dreams. Other sectors whose values were similarly distorted and distended by years of financial deception and regulatory disregard, such as housing and insurance, will also have to return to the real world before they can recover. Which could mean more stock losses. - rheich

*

Since we're on GE & CNBC tonight, lets not forget that like GMAC, that GE long ago 30+ years ago, got out of making shit, and started selling credit, and called it GECC.

Today $800B of GE assets, all their fucking assets are toxic waste.

Toilet tissue at least you can wipe your ass, GE stock doesn't even have that value as its virtual.

Anonymous said...

Doctor Doom
The U.S. Financial System Is Effectively Insolvent
Nouriel Roubini, 03.05.09, 12:01 AM EST

There is a grave risk of a global L-shaped depression.

For those who argue that the rate of growth of economic activity is turning positive--that economies are contracting but at a slower rate than in the fourth quarter of 2008--the latest data don't confirm this relative optimism. In 2008's fourth quarter, gross domestic product fell by about 6% in the U.S., 6% in the euro zone, 8% in Germany, 12% in Japan, 16% in Singapore and 20% in South Korea. So things are even more awful in Europe and Asia than in the U.S.

There is, in fact, a rising risk of a global L-shaped depression that would be even worse than the current, painful U-shaped global recession. Here's why:

First, note that most indicators suggest that the second derivative of economic activity is still sharply negative in Europe and Japan and close to negative in the U.S. and China. Some signals that the second derivative was turning positive for the U.S. and China turned out to be fake starts. For the U.S., the Empire State and Philly Fed indexes of manufacturing are still in free fall; initial claims for unemployment benefits are up to scary levels, suggesting accelerating job losses; and January's sales increase is a fluke--more of a rebound from a very depressed December, after aggressive post-holiday sales, than a sustainable recovery.

For China, the growth of credit is only driven by firms borrowing cheap to invest in higher-returning deposits, not to invest, and steel prices in China have resumed their sharp fall. The more scary data are those for trade flows in Asia, with exports falling by about 40% to 50% in Japan, Taiwan and Korea.

Even correcting for the effect of the Chinese New Year, exports and imports are sharply down in China, with imports falling (-40%) more than exports. This is a scary signal, as Chinese imports are mostly raw materials and intermediate inputs. So while Chinese exports have fallen so far less than in the rest of Asia, they may fall much more sharply in the months ahead, as signaled by the free fall in imports.

With economic activity contracting in 2009's first quarter at the same rate as in 2008's fourth quarter, a nasty U-shaped recession could turn into a more severe L-shaped near-depression (or stag-deflation). The scale and speed of synchronized global economic contraction is really unprecedented (at least since the Great Depression), with a free fall of GDP, income, consumption, industrial production, employment, exports, imports, residential investment and, more ominously, capital expenditures around the world. And now many emerging-market economies are on the verge of a fully fledged financial crisis, starting with emerging Europe.

Fiscal and monetary stimulus is becoming more aggressive in the U.S. and China, and less so in the euro zone and Japan, where policymakers are frozen and behind the curve. But such stimulus is unlikely to lead to a sustained economic recovery. Monetary easing--even unorthodox--is like pushing on a string when (1) the problems of the economy are of insolvency/credit rather than just illiquidity; (2) there is a global glut of capacity (housing, autos and consumer durables and massive excess capacity, because of years of overinvestment by China, Asia and other emerging markets), while strapped firms and households don't react to lower interest rates, as it takes years to work out this glut; (3) deflation keeps real policy rates high and rising while nominal policy rates are close to zero; and (4) high yield spreads are still 2,000 basis points relative to safe Treasuries in spite of zero policy rates.
Comment On This Story

Fiscal policy in the U.S. and China also has its limits. Of the $800 billion of the U.S. fiscal stimulus, only $200 billion will be spent in 2009, with most of it being backloaded to 2010 and later. And of this $200 billion, half is tax cuts that will be mostly saved rather than spent, as households are worried about jobs and paying their credit card and mortgage bills. (Of last year's $100 billion tax cut, only 30% was spent and the rest saved.)

Thus, given the collapse of five out of six components of aggregate demand (consumption, residential investment, capital expenditure in the corporate sector, business inventories and exports), the stimulus from government spending will be puny this year.

Chinese fiscal stimulus will also provide much less bang for the headline buck ($480 billion). For one thing, you have an economy radically dependent on trade: a trade surplus of 12% of GDP, exports above 40% of GDP, and most investment (that is almost 50% of GDP) going to the production of more capacity/machinery to produce more exportable goods. The rest of investment is in residential construction (now falling sharply following the bursting of the Chinese housing bubble) and infrastructure investment (the only component of investment that is rising).

With massive excess capacity in the industrial/manufacturing sector and thousands of firms shutting down, why would private and state-owned firms invest more, even if interest rates are lower and credit is cheaper? Forcing state-owned banks and firms to, respectively, lend and spend/invest more will only increase the size of nonperforming loans and the amount of excess capacity. And with most economic activity and fiscal stimulus being capital- rather than labor-intensive, the drag on job creation will continue.

So without a recovery in the U.S. and global economy, there cannot be a sustainable recovery of Chinese growth. And with the U.S, recovery requiring lower consumption, higher private savings and lower trade deficits, a U.S. recovery requires China's and other surplus countries' (Japan, Germany, etc.) growth to depend more on domestic demand and less on net exports. But domestic-demand growth is anemic in surplus countries for cyclical and structural reasons. So a recovery of the global economy cannot occur without a rapid and orderly adjustment of global current account imbalances.

Meanwhile, the adjustment of U.S. consumption and savings is continuing. The January personal spending numbers were up for one month (a temporary fluke driven by transient factors), and personal savings were up to 5%. But that increase in savings is only illusory. There is a difference between the national income account (NIA) definition of household savings (disposable income minus consumption spending) and the economic definitions of savings as the change in wealth/net worth: savings as the change in wealth is equal to the NIA definition of savings plus capital gains/losses on the value of existing wealth (financial assets and real assets such as housing wealth).

In the years when stock markets and home values were going up, the apologists for the sharp rise in consumption and measured fall in savings were arguing that the measured savings were distorted downward by failing to account for the change in net worth due to the rise in home prices and the stock markets.

But now with stock prices down over 50% from peak and home prices down 25% from peak (and still to fall another 20%), the destruction of household net worth has become dramatic. Thus, correcting for the fall in net worth, personal savings is not 5%, as the official NIA definition suggests, but rather sharply negative.

In other terms, given the massive destruction of household wealth/net worth since 2006-07, the NIA measure of savings will have to increase much more sharply than has currently occurred to restore households' severely damaged balance sheets. Thus, the contraction of real consumption will have to continue for years to come before the adjustment is completed.

In the meanwhile the Dow Jones industrial average is down today below 7,000, and U.S. equity indexes are 20% down from the beginning of the year. I argued in early January that the 25% stock market rally from late November to the year's end was another bear market suckers' rally that would fizzle out completely once an onslaught of worse than expected macro and earnings news, and worse than expected financial shocks, occurs. And the same factors will put further downward pressures on U.S. and global equities for the rest of the year, as the recession will continue into 2010, if not longer (a rising risk of an L-shaped near-depression).

Of course, you cannot rule out another bear market suckers' rally in 2009, most likely in the second or third quarters. The drivers of this rally will be the improvement in second derivatives of economic growth and activity in the U.S. and China that the policy stimulus will provide on a temporary basis. But after the effects of a tax cut fizzle out in late summer, and after the shovel-ready infrastructure projects are done, the policy stimulus will slacken by the fourth quarter, as most infrastructure projects take years to be started, let alone finished.

Similarly in China, the fiscal stimulus will provide a fake boost to non-tradable productive activities while the traded sector and manufacturing continue to contract. But given the severity of macro, household, financial-firm and corporate imbalances in the U.S. and around the world, this second- or third-quarter suckers' market rally will fizzle out later in the year, like the previous five ones in the last 12 months.

In the meantime, the massacre in financial markets and among financial firms is continuing. The debate on "bank nationalization" is borderline surreal, with the U.S. government having already committed--between guarantees, investment, recapitalization and liquidity provision--about $9 trillion of government financial resources to the financial system (and having already spent $2 trillion of this staggering $9 trillion figure).

Thus, the U.S. financial system is de facto nationalized, as the Federal Reserve has become the lender of first and only resort rather than the lender of last resort, and the U.S. Treasury is the spender and guarantor of first and only resort. The only issue is whether banks and financial institutions should also be nationalized de jure.

But even in this case, the distinction is only between partial nationalization and full nationalization: With 36% (and soon to be larger) ownership of Citi (nyse: C - news - people ), the U.S. government is already the largest shareholder there. So what is the non-sense about not nationalizing banks? Citi is already effectively partially nationalized; the only issue is whether it should be fully nationalized.

Ditto for AIG (nyse: AIG - news - people ), which lost $62 billion in the fourth quarter and $99 billion in all of 2008 and is already 80% government-owned. With such staggering losses, it should be formally 100% government-owned. And now the Fed and Treasury commitments of public resources to the bailout of the shareholders and creditors of AIG have gone from $80 billion to $162 billion.

Given that common shareholders of AIG are already effectively wiped out (the stock has become a penny stock), the bailout of AIG is a bailout of the creditors of AIG that would now be insolvent without such a bailout. AIG sold over $500 billion of toxic credit default swap protection, and the counter-parties of this toxic insurance are major U.S. broker-dealers and banks.

News and banks analysts' reports suggested that Goldman Sachs (nyse: GS - news - people ) got about $25 billion of the government bailout of AIG and that Merrill Lynch was the second largest benefactor of the government largesse. These are educated guesses, as the government is hiding the counter-party benefactors of the AIG bailout. (Maybe Bloomberg should sue the Fed and Treasury again to have them disclose this information.)

But some things are known: Goldman's Lloyd Blankfein was the only CEO of a Wall Street firm who was present at the New York Fed meeting when the AIG bailout was discussed. So let us not kid each other: The $162 billion bailout of AIG is a nontransparent, opaque and shady bailout of the AIG counter-parties: Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch and other domestic and foreign financial institutions.

So for the Treasury to hide behind the "systemic risk" excuse to fork out another $30 billion to AIG is a polite way to say that without such a bailout (and another half-dozen government bailout programs such as TAF, TSLF, PDCF, TARP, TALF and a program that allowed $170 billion of additional debt borrowing by banks and other broker-dealers, with a full government guarantee), Goldman Sachs and every other broker-dealer and major U.S. bank would already be fully insolvent today.

And even with the $2 trillion of government support, most of these financial institutions are insolvent, as delinquency and charge-off rates are now rising at a rate--given the macro outlook--that means expected credit losses for U.S. financial firms will peak at $3.6 trillion. So, in simple words, the U.S. financial system is effectively insolvent.

Anonymous said...

DUMB FUCKING BEND PUG's have discovered the 'mirror' who could have guessed?

...

Even before the November 2008 defeat—even before the financial crisis and the congressional elections of November 2006—it was already apparent that the Republican Party and the conservative movement were in deep trouble. And not just because of Iraq, either (although Iraq obviously did not help).

At the peak of the Bush boom in 2007, the typical American worker was earning barely more after inflation than the typical American worker had earned in 2000. Out of those flat earnings, that worker was paying more for food, energy and out-of-pocket costs of health care. Political parties that do not deliver economic improvement for the typical person do not get reelected. We Republicans and conservatives were not delivering. The reasons for our failure are complex and controversial, but the consequences are not.

We lost the presidency in 2008. In 2006 and 2008, together, we lost 51 seats in the House and 14 in the Senate. Even in 2004, President Bush won reelection by the narrowest margin of any reelected president in American history.

The trends below those vote totals were even more alarming. Republicans have never done well among the poor and the nonwhite—and as the country's Hispanic population grows, so, too, do those groups. More ominously, Republicans are losing their appeal to voters with whom they've historically done well.

Anonymous said...

Every day, Rush Limbaugh reassures millions of core Republican voters that no change is needed: if people don't appreciate what we are saying, then say it louder.

Isn't that what happened in 1994? Certainly this is a good approach for Rush himself.

He claims 20 million listeners per week, and that suffices to make him a very wealthy man. And if another 100 million people cannot stand him, what does he care? What can they do to him other than … not listen? It's not as if they can vote against him.

But they can vote against Republican candidates for Congress. They can vote against Republican nominees for president. And if we allow ourselves to be overidentified with somebody who earns his fortune by giving offense, they will vote against us. Two months into 2009, President Obama and the Democratic Congress have already enacted into law the most ambitious liberal program since the mid-1960s. More, much more is to come. Through this burst of activism, the Republican Party has been flat on its back.

Decisions that will haunt American taxpayers for generations have been made with hardly a debate.

Anonymous said...

Frum Bitches slaps the fucking Limp-toilet-bowel but good, ...

In the days since I stumbled into this controversy, I've received a great deal of e-mail. (Most of it on days when Levin or Hannity or Hugh Hewitt or Limbaugh himself has had something especially disobliging to say about me.) Most of these e-mails say some version of the same thing: if you don't agree with Rush, quit calling yourself a conservative and get out of the Republican Party. There's the perfect culmination of the outlook Rush Limbaugh has taught his fans and followers: we want to transform the party of Lincoln, Eisenhower and Reagan into a party of unanimous dittoheads—and we don't care how much the party has to shrink to do it. That's not the language of politics. It's the language of a cult.

I'm a pretty conservative guy. On most issues, I doubt Limbaugh and I even disagree very much. But the issues on which we do disagree are maybe the most important to the future of the conservative movement and the Republican Party: Should conservatives be trying to provoke or persuade? To narrow our coalition or enlarge it? To enflame or govern? And finally (and above all): to profit—or to serve?

Anonymous said...

Then there is the world of 'ideas' something the KUNT's of BEND, choose to ignore, ...

For more than a half century, William F. Buckley Jr., who died last week at 82, largely inspired and held together the conservative movement that is collapsing today. The Wall Street Journal editorialized: "Several generations of conservatives grew up (in more than one sense) with Bill Buckley. Now they have—well, there is no one like him." "He changed the personality of conservatism," Brooks says. "It had been sort of negative, and he made it smart and sophisticated and pushed out all these oddballs and created a movement." More recently, says Brooks, conservatism has "lost something." In the conservatism spawned by talk radio and TV, the haters and know-nothings are back, ranting about immigrants and liberals. "It was a lot more philosophical under him," he says. At those nightly salons, Buckley liked to talk and argue about ideas and literature and the nature of man; politics was rarely mentioned. "The new conservatives are not as intellectually creative as those dealing with communism and socialism," says Brooks. Buckley tolerated some disreputable ideas, including segregation; but he had the capacity to change.

I agree long live Rushbo&Ramhbo, the age of man is over, the age of the buffoon has begun.

Anonymous said...

Good shit this week, you bastards!!!!

Can wait to see what Homer cooks up for us "dittoheads" tomorrow!!!!

Goo' nite.

Anonymous said...

From William F. Buckley to Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, Savage and this 14-year-old kid:

SITTING in the back seat of his mother’s van as she drives through Atlanta suburbs, Jonathan Krohn is about to sign off with a conservative radio talk show host in Florida. In the 40 minutes he’s been on the air, with the help of his mother’s cellphone, this hyper-articulate Georgia eighth grader has attacked the stimulus bill, identified leaders he thinks will salvage the Republican Party’s image, and assessed the legitimacy of Barack Obama’s birth certificate.

The show’s host chuckles and asks whether President Obama has called Jonathan “a little fascist.”

“The president hasn’t come after me yet,” Jonathan says chummily, “but we’ve had other people come after me!”

“Jonathan!” his mother hisses from the driver’s seat.

The interview concluded, Jonathan wistfully handed his mother her cellphone. His parents still won’t let him have one, even though he turned 14 last Sunday, right after he became an instant news media darling and the conservative movement’s underage graybeard at last weekend’s Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington.

The annual convention brings in the movement’s grand old lions, like Rush Limbaugh, as well as cubs to rally 8,500 of the faithful, who were shaken by the election of Barack Obama. Jonathan, a slight, home-schooled only child whose teeth are in braces, is so passionate about his beliefs that he spent his summer writing “Define Conservatism,” an 86-page book outlining what he says are its core values. In January, he contacted CPAC organizers, asking to speak there.

With some skepticism, they gave him a spot on a Friday panel of grassroots activists. But Jonathan, an experienced child actor, rocked the house with a three-minute speech, which was remarkable not so much for what he said, but his electrifying delivery. The speech was part pep talk, part book promotion. By Saturday morning, an archdeacon of the movement was saying, “I’m Bill Bennett: I used to work for Ronald Reagan and now I’m a colleague of Jonathan Krohn’s!”

As video of the speech coursed through the Internet, radio talk show hosts and television reporters at the conference sought him eagerly.

In less than a week, Jonathan appeared on “Fox and Friends” and CNN, and broadcast network anchors requested interviews. He has lost count of the number of radio shows he has spoken on. Though his family has received hate mail, accusing them of brainwashing their son, a Jonathan Krohn fan club has sprung up on Facebook. High honors: Jon Stewart has already poked fun at him.

And the invitations have only snowballed since the family returned to their modest house in a subdivision here.

Why just that morning, his mother, Marla Krohn, marveled, a staff member for a potential candidate for Georgia governor asked for a meeting with Jonathan. In her gentle drawl, Mrs. Krohn said cautiously, “I’m not sure I’m a supporter of his.”

“Neither am I,” Jonathan piped in.

“But I’m a voter,” Mrs. Krohn reminded him firmly.

Jonathan retorted, “Now that I’m a political pundit, I have the ability to influence people. I have to think about it!”

But first, his mother reminded him, he had some homework to finish.

He’s an unusual kid with an unusual background. Jonathan’s parents, Doug, a computer systems integrator, and Marla, a sales representative and former actress who teaches drama and speech to middle-school students, have been home-schooling their bright, curious son since the sixth grade. On Fridays, Jonathan joins 10 middle-school students at the Classical School in Woodstock, where classes are taught from a Christian perspective, for five hours of study, including Latin. They have two 10-minute recesses for tag, said Jonathan’s teacher, Stephen P. Gilchrist. Lunch is eaten at their desks while they work.

“Other children his age are not quite sure how to take him,” Mr. Gilchrist said. “Jonathan is so intense, so verbal and a strong personality. But as they get to know him, they respect him for what he is. And he is tons of fun.”

Jonathan’s father oversees his math; he studies Arabic with a tutor.

“Before I got into politics,” Jonathan said as he sat with his parents in the study of their home, “I wanted to be a missionary to people in the Middle East. I thought it would be better to speak with them in their own language.” The family are active members of Peachtree Corners Baptist Church in Norcross, Ga.

That was several careers ago. But he is sticking with Arabic, because, “it’s important to talk with our allies in their language.”

Although the Krohns are conservative, they say Jonathan’s passion for politics is largely his. “Politics bore me,” his mother said flatly. “I’ve learned a lot from Jonathan about the candidates I’ve voted for.” Doug Krohn said he listened to talk radio, but with his Iowa-born soft-sell manner, he’s hardly the pontificating firebrand his son is.

Jonathan said he became a political enthusiast at 8, after hearing about a Democratic filibuster on judicial nominations. “I thought, ‘Who goes to work saying, ‘I’m going to filibuster today?’ ” he said.

Mr. Krohn, looking bleary-eyed by recent events, muttered, “And now he can filibuster with the best of them.”

Jonathan would wake up at 6 a.m. to listen to Bill Bennett’s “Morning in America” show and became riveted by politics and American history. Soon, Mr. Bennett, whom Jonathan now describes as, “my mentor and very good friend,” was taking Jonathan’s calls.

“Jonathan was an extraordinary boy, very special,” Mr. Bennett said, in a phone interview. “He wowed my audience, he wowed me. He’s very engaging and learned. He’s got staying power.” -- NY Times today


Has it struck anybody else that the Republican Party has turned into a freak show ... or anyway, a vaudeville act?

But it makes sense that a 14-year-old is a rising right-wing star; right-wing doctrines can't be taken seriously by any intelligent human being with much more than a 14-year-old's experience of the world.

I was a Buckley-style conservative myself until I graduated from college. Then I quickly found out that the real world simply did not correspond to conservatives' ideas about it. I concluded that Buckley had to be either (a) uninformed or (b) lying. Since Buckley obviously was not uninformed, I went with "b."

Anonymous said...

Buckley was hilarious, what else matters?

In the beginning, say in the early 1980's Limbaugh was hilarious.

The 14yr old is scary.

Today we have joe-the-plumber, john-14-bible-thumper, and mcPalin,... Take your pic, or buy them all with one purchase of limbaugh.

Anonymous said...

“Other children his age are not quite sure how to take him,” Mr. Gilchrist said. “Jonathan is so intense, so verbal and a strong personality. But as they get to know him, they respect him for what he is. And he is tons of fun.”

[ Isn't this what they would call a BULLY now-a-days?? ]


Jonathan’s father oversees his math; he studies Arabic with a tutor.

“Before I got into politics,” Jonathan said as he sat with his parents in the study of their home, “I wanted to be a missionary to people in the Middle East. I thought it would be better to speak with them in their own language.” The family are active members of Peachtree Corners Baptist Church in Norcross, Ga.

[ Great I know tons of these jeebus-freaks that go to the middle-east and try to shove baby-jeebus up the ass of MUSLIMS, ... perhaps lil Jonathon can get a job with the CIA if he goes to college, they need 'believers' who know arabic. If lil john traveled much in the Muslim world he would quickly learn that they have an express ticket for those who want to go to heaven. ]

My favorite part was lil-john saying that he was learning Arabic to work with our 'partners', he must have already made some connections with US oil.

Behind every successful adult there was a 'child prodigy', but either than making frequent call-in's to talk radio, I'm not sure what makes this child into a prodigy? You used to have to do something like solve in-solvable math problems at 10, or write a Bach concerto at 12, now if you just call Limbaugh and talk shit at 14, your a child prodigy.

The age of the buffoon is begun.

I can see it now vast hoards of ameriKKKans parking infants in front of talk-radio, all the well knowing that they're creating a little gravy-train for the future.

Anonymous said...

This is really Michael-Jackson, I mean Rush is going to surround himself with children, who only know Right-Wing Think, and he'll have sleep over's, I wonder what he'll call his homestead, can't use Neverland, how about CryptoNaziVille??

Hitler, & Goebbels are well documented to like little boyz also, they recruited children as young as possible. Call in today and report your parents. Then when then parents go off to jail, the State (Limbaugh) gets to 'supervise' the child.

Life is good in CNV.

Bewert said...

Re: Jonathan said he became a political enthusiast at 8, after hearing about a Democratic filibuster on judicial nominations. “I thought, ‘Who goes to work saying, ‘I’m going to filibuster today?’ ” he said.

###

How charmingly naive coming from a Repug kid...

Bewert said...

BTW, we have heard much about the Pugs plans to privatize Soc Sec so we can all invest in the stock market lately, either.

«Oldest ‹Older   401 – 454 of 454   Newer› Newest»